"If an anarchist society can't survive an imperialist onslaught then it's not actually a realistic society" - which I kinda get but like you could make that argument for any minority governance structure..
The Democratic People's Republic of Tankiejerk
Dunking on Tankies from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.
Rules:
- No bigotry of any kind.
- No tankies or right-wingers. Liberals are allowed so long as they are aware of this
- No genocide denial
We allow posts about tankie behavior even off fedi, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion.
Curious about non-tankie leftism? If you've got a little patience for 19th century academic style, let a little Marx and Kropotkin be your primer!
Marx's Communist Manifesto, short and accessible! Highly recommended if you haven't read it
Oftentimes, even, the issue is that the anarchist society is not well-established - much smaller anarchist societies often put up a good fight against non-anarchist societies that are much larger - such as the Ukrainian anarchists fighting against the combined might of Russia's former imperial holdings under the Bolsheviks during the Russian Civil War, and Anarchist Catalonia against (ultimately) all of Spain during the Spanish Civil War.
If they didn't strangle these movements in the cradle, they might actually have to examine the ability of anarchist movements on their own merits.
The USSR didn't survive an imperialist ondlaught because they internalized it. People were the thing they imperialised upon.
My poor boy Makhno siding with Bolsheviks and later going "nah, screw them" to ally with Petlyura says a lot about Bolsheviks.
Makhno my love 😭