this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
-57 points (39.9% liked)

/0 Governance

249 readers
22 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Update: Although we officially still have a few days remaining on this vote, it seems clear that this proposal won't be voted in.

Thanks to everyone for their feedback and votes! I had expected a split vote on this one and it turned out around 1/3 for the proposal and 2/3 against, so that is a quite emphatic no! And of course, we will respect the vote.

I hope we can maybe revisit our instance blocking policies more generally after lemmy has properly working per-user instance blocks, as some folks commented as it will open up more options for personal choice. For example, we could keep a list of sanctioned instances (like csam site) as it works now, but maintain a separate list of "use with caution" instances (aka hesitations in fediseer) that are blocked by default in each user's personal blocklist. But now users could choose to enable those sites for themselves if they wanted to.

For me, that seems like the best overall solution for user choice, and for the new user experience. But it may not sound good to you folks, so that's why we have the voting system in place so we can get quality feedback and also hopefully generate ideas for improvements that will benefit the community.

On that note, anyone can contact me or any of the site admins if they have a proposal they want to appear here on the governance community, and we'll be happy to help you out.

Unruffled


Hi mateys. I'm gonna keep this short and sweet because I don't really have any skin in the game on this one. I am in fact quite happy to leave this decision up to the wider dbzer0 community. On that note, please do not comment on this post unless you are a dbzer0 user - we'd prefer not to have anyone else weighing in.

This post isn't to convince anyone to re-federate or otherwise. In fact, our admin team genuinely doesn't know for sure what our community sentiment is on the topic, or whether or not it's worth a try. My guess is that the community will be quite divided on the topic, as many users are on the topic of hexbear. But the only way to find out for sure is to ask you, so here we are.

But I will say that for me personally, although we still have the occasional drama, and despite past run-ins, I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs. While I think its fair to say our instance and theirs will never see eye-to-eye on certain topics, we have coexisted with them in relative calm over the past 12 months. If we can achieve ~~harmony~~a ceasefire with hexbear, then maybe we could do the same with lemmygrad?

I'd also prefer our users to make their own choices with regard to instance blocking of leftist sites in particular.

Obviously there will be some folks here that will hate this idea, and some who think it is worth a try and/or would like to make their own choices with regards to blocking. All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?

Because this might be a divisive topic, I'm setting the threshold for this proposal succeeding at >66.6% majority rather than the default >50% so that there is a clear mandate.

The proposal is as follows:

That dbzer0 removes lemmygrad.ml from our blocked instances list for a 1-month trial period. Another vote will then be conducted to either federate permanently or to reinstate the instance block.

Notes

  • AFAIK none of our admins have discussed this with lemmygrad prior to this post, so we don't know how they will respond, even if this vote succeeds. But having just checked, we are not currently blocked from their end, so in theory re-federating will be a straightforward process (at least technically).
  • We really don't want to cause a big rift in our instance over this, so please there is really no need to get into heated arguments (I mean, what are the chances? Lol). Your vote is what counts most and we will commit to be guided by the voting outcome.
  • If this vote succeeds we will reach out to their admins to see if we can come to some mutual agreement about reintegrating our communities while hopefully keeping conflict to a minimum. Having said that, some conflict is probably inevitable ngl. But I think we will be able to ride it out ok.
  • I've covered a lot of concerns and talked about conflict a lot, so I'll just add that the big positive of re-federating is that there will be a ton of new users and content to interact with, which will hopefully add to the Lemmy experience for our users if the proposal is voted in.

expiry: 7

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm for it. We don't block all the lib instances and they're arguably more disgusting for supporting all manner of bullshit going on around the globe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Against, fuck tankies. Literal imperialist Russian propaganda mills at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not for me, no. IMO, a lot of the users over there are only interested in cosplaying authoritarianism, which I am not personally into.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] giacomo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Better to stay defederated IMO.

They are ban heavy for daft reasons so ruins the experience for new users. It’d be different if they had daft ideas but engaged with debate; but they don’t - and it’s just feeding more people into an echo chamber that has some people just as far gone as MAGA.

Recent years have taught me the dangers of that and how little most people are able to critically think about things. Less of an issue on this instance I imagine, but even anti-authoritarian spaces are being increasingly captured by authoritarian interests.

Id support the top 5 worst offenders from the power tripping mods community to be defederated by default across as many instances as we can convince. Punish censorship.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Absent any compelling reason or evidence of this proposal arising organically from the community rather than springing to life fully-formed from the forehead of an admin, no. Unless something is broken, it need not be repaired.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No.

Lemmy already has serious issues of political divisiveness driving off new users. We don't need to further that "to own the libs".

While I don't truly think that's why this is being suggested, we don't seem to have a good reason to refedrate other than "they appear to be behaving lately".

Also, the optics of the timing of this occurring right as Admiral Patrick is closing dubvee over (among many things) the general tone of discussion on Lemmy being abrasive as all hell in large part due to political division spurring disrespect? Not a good look guys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I tried to make Hexbear work for a while. I ended up blocking them because they kept wasting my time, having to check any source, and statement I ever saw from them, with basically all then falling apart.
I thought maybe blocking some offending hexbear communities would be enough, but then kept seeing the same pattern on anything hexbear associated. In the end I burned out on it.

I suspect that most others will equally come to the conclusion of instance blocking, which I think makes the pivotal problem here. Can we allow federation with an instance that the vast majority of our userbase has blocked?

On an individual level I agree, that you can "just block lemmygrad/hexbear/ml/world/startrek" if you don't like them for any reason. But that basically leaves interaction with that instance to all the others. It's fine if a few do it, but if most do it, it resigns the platform to uncontested bullshitting from lemmygrads side.

At first that might then load the mods. They can't really block lemmygrad if they have to moderate their communities from them. But then what about the lies, misleading statements, that got me burned out. The stuff not obviously problematic, and not a rule violation either. If noone bothers checking and contesting that, or those few that do argue then get overwhelmed by lemmygrad votes and downvoted into oblivion on those enclave threads, then the uncensored state of your instance posts will be hell and we will simply be closing our eyes to it with the blocking.

At that point, other instances will come to know us as the ones with lemmygrad brigading in our posts, and the easy solution there is not to figure out how to get rid of the lemmygrad stuff bleeding thru their own defederation, but to simply instance block us.

In summary, I don't think personal instance blocking helps with the nazibar problem. We can only federate if enough people will not block lemmygrad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No, I disagree. The near worship of authoritarian leaders is a hard no go for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mataresian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A hell no, how can I make sure my vote is tallied? I usually don't vote but in this case I'm heavily against. I'm not against opposing sides, but only if the opposing side of open to other opinions as well, lemmygrad is not really open with extreme views.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No. Does not sound appealing. Refed with them so a huge chunk of us get fed up and have to manually block, knowing they're still nominally connected to the instance? I really don't want to be surrounded by that stuff nor by people being influenced by it.

Edit: Honestly, the more I think about it, the more I dislike it. If you hop over there and read many of their posts, they don't just lean hard left/right, they are in a genuinely alternate reality. Like, you could move some of their posts to an alt-history roleplay and they'd make more sense. I'm down to hear different views, but I want them stemming from this reality. Harder no than before.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deralax@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I wanted censorship I would have stayed on reddit. Open the gates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] The_Helmet_Stays_On@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Completely forgot they were an instance so I am fine if they stay gone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gsdsam@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, don't need to see more tankie shite.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm broadly against defederation in general without good material cause (such as: instance does a lot of trolling or brigading, instance hosts illegal or deeply immoral content).

I like the hexbears! There's some bad ones of course, but there's people on this instance I don't like or agree with so that's hardly an argument against. I can block the worst tankies of lemmygrad as well, or the whole instance if it really personally bothered me.

In broader terms, I think we see enough of an amount of center-lib arguments that it's essentially the water we swim in. I'm glad that out and out right wing takes are very rare, but I think some more extreme left views could be good. I don't agree with vanguardists at all but I can't act like coalition with them against overt fascists isnt necessary sometimes.

And anyway, federation isnt about political coalition. It's about exchange of ideas and I'm confident enough in the correctness of anarchy to not feel threatened by the ideas of other leftists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frozenpopsicle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Support

It will be some degree of annoying, but I am against blocking in general. I feel if instance blocking can be avoided then it should be. Give it a try.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zedd00@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No. I don't see any benefit in giving a bunch of fash more chances to worm into people's brains.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnrefinedChihuahua@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I say bring them back. If people don't like them, it's super easy for individual users to just instance-block.

.ee went away. Dubvee.org (which was a great place) went away just today. Lemmy is breaking down, and all this separation will just hasten the demise. There are plenty of tools for people to individually block things they don't like.

So my vote is for re-federating them! And thank you for bringing this up!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] plant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hexbear is insufferable a lot of the time, no thanks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] somerandomperson1231@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I say yes. A 1 month trial with them seems reasonable. I may disagree with their ideas, but if a reasonable level of civility is kept I think it will be good. I can block the communities and people I disagree with the most for my viewing pleasure and others have the chance to decide what they want to see.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KarfiolosHus@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely not. Cannot wait to be yelled at by the politically demented radicals that I'm a libtard under a cute puppy post.

I'm exaggerating of course, but not too much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

sure, see what happens, it's discourse. in the best (and naïve) scenario we can effect change by only banning many individual users who use bad-faith rhetoric

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] confusedwiseman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I spent some time browsing, and we choose to federate, my block list will need to expand. If others want that…OK, but that’s very much not for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No.

Even in here you can find the tankie triad starting shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] No_Bark@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I say refederate. We haven't blocked any of the turbolib instances, so I think we should let users themselves decide what instance to block.

Anecdotal, but I've never had an issue with Lemmygrad or Hexbear like so many people here constantly complain about. I find both instances preferable to most of the shit that appears from places like .world

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ahhh, how about no, please.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have not been on an instance that federates with it, so personally, I don’t know what the culture is like. I’m all for building bridges with ideological cousins - modern social media is one giant machine-propelled incubator of fascist sympathy nowadays, so I really do feel strongly about having a meaningful, robust, community-driven coalition of good people with good politics. I personally believe something like BlueSky has been a big black hole vacuuming up potential fediverse users, but you could make the case as well that it puts off our eternal September for more time. Maybe it’s not the worst thing that could happen.

That said, I do hear much worse feedback about grad than I do about .ml or Hexbear. At the same time, I understand that it is one of the main instances tied to the software’s development, and that alone makes it relevant to a big instance with a tech slant like ours, IMO.

I have to abstain. I think I’d like to vote Yay, but I don’t have all the information. I don’t know enough about grad to feel capable of making a judgement.

FWIW a lot of the .ml and Hexbear bashing is ridiculous, IMO. All the complaints about a “triad” and subsequent positive interactions on these two instances have made them seem unfairly maligned to me. Maybe it’s because I live in a part of the world where politics and political violence is even more messy, and the concept of “critical support” is much more clear to me. I don’t have west-as-default baggage. So a lot of what comes off to others as apologia for states that do bad things doesn’t necessarily bother me as much as it would bother someone else. I’ve seen more frequent egregious takes on .world and ShJW. Some of those guys legitimately want Israel to turn my home into a parking lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

They default to light mode even with my theming set to dark, and that appals me more than their politics ever could. The medium is the message, and the medium makes me physically recoil in pain.

They're more earnest than hexbear, so ill be more likely to find personal confict, but who cares.

Otherwise dont object to a trial; fucking can't with the shitlibs. Any counterweight.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Do not defederate from any instance unless they are actively malicious (eg flooding with illegal content, targeting users with harassment/doxxing, or exploiting something). Though the second one is tricky as what constitutes “harassment” is tricky.

A user has the option to block instances if they feel content on said instance is offensive or disagreeable to them.

Rather than deny autonomy to users, refederate, and allow users to practice their own autonomy. If they’re terrified of the spooky leftists they are free to block the instance

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Go spin up your own server with zero defederation policy and see how that works out for you. It will not be pleasant, that’s for sure.

Everyone likes to say “wahh don’t defederate!!” But grad was defederated years ago for reasons, and the community decided on it back then, like this is asking to bring them back.

Or you can go find a server that federates with them if you want. There are probably several. Have fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›