this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
30 points (89.5% liked)

PC Gaming

11838 readers
1049 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SmoochyPit@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 days ago

sanitising parts to be in accordance with console standards or censoring the game, depending on who you ask.

It’s censorship, I don’t really see how one could argue (well) that it’s not. Self-censorship is still censorship, and seeing as the rationale for this change was specific platform policies, I think it’s absolutely fair to view the change happening on PC critically.

Honestly, the story and gameplay is still very dark and gritty, so I don’t think these changes would’ve had much backlash had they been this way from the start. Sometimes explicit content isn’t strictly required to get a point across, and can make a game less accessible, so I can understand games having a warning with a toggle.

But I’m very against total censorship. This reminds me a lot of when Superhot VR removed multiple scenes 4 years after the game’s release, because they were related to self-harm or suicide. Note that the game had a warning on launch as well as a toggle for this content. The linked article does a great deep dive on it, but imo I think the change really does affect the game. I got done with it (post-censorship) and did not see the hype. The game wasn’t very long and didn’t have many “whoa” moments. But shooting yourself… that’s something that you can only really do in VR, assuming it’s not coded in to a flatscreen game. And it would’ve fit into the game’s plot and themes very well.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I felt bad for buying this game after i found out the devs are fascist bootlickers

[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

You'd think the "literal SWAT police simulator" structure would speak for itself...

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

Also their refusal to admit to blatent usage of AI generated art for their assets.

What did the devs do?

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everyone hates the cops. Instill they need them.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When police go on strike the crime rates stay the same

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

In the US, the crime rates would plummet. Especially shootings. 🥲

[–] Nima@leminal.space 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

you'd think that it would just be made available as like a settings option or something. would probably be much easier and keep everyone happy.

they still could just make it a settings option, honestly. literally so many games have them now.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

First mod ideas?