this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
40 points (100.0% liked)

Any Surrealist and Abstract Content

0 readers
357 users here now

A place for surrealist and abstract content. Art, Memes, Data-moshing, optical illusions, liminal spaces, weirdly comfy stuff and anything else you think at least loosely fits this description goes.

๐Ÿฅณ 250 people in 72 hours! Thanks guys and gals.

Rules

โœ๏ธ If you know the artist, please credit them

๐Ÿ”ž Tag NSFW (no porn, please. Non-sexual nudity is fine)

๐Ÿซ‚ Be respectful of others

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Self promotion is not only allowed, but encouraged, I would love to see your original content

๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ No politics (light-hearted jokes are fine)

๐Ÿ‘ When in doubt, just post. Unless you are deliberately trying, I most likely won't remove your post

founded 5 days ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Bimfred@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The openings are straight vertical. The rotating bits clipping through the inner corners bothers me to no end.

[โ€“] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Ha ha came here to say that! Now it looks just like a half circle rotating, if it went straight down (and not rotating) it would be so much better!

[โ€“] Nebula@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Could be angled, it's hard to tell. I don't see any visible clipping.

[โ€“] Bimfred@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The edges of the opening are effectively the same lengths as the edges of the rotating pieces. If the walls were angled enough to avoid clipping, there would be a visible gap as the rotating bit moves through and its inner face moves away from the inner face of the opening. To avoid clipping and still have continuous contact, the inner surfaces between the openings would need to be rounded all the way to the edge.

[โ€“] Nebula@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago

Makes sense. Thanks I hate this now ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Nebula@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago