this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
226 points (99.6% liked)

News

31214 readers
3795 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 4 days ago (1 children)

While Trump is obviously the prime mover of the ludicrously obvious wholesale destruction of the US, more and more I don't really blame him. At heart, he's really just a thin-skinned ball of insecurity with the emotional development of a toddler driven by primal instincts to attack everything that he considers a threat, which is pretty much anything and everything.

I think more all the time that the lion's share of the blame for all of this is more legitimately placed on the thousands and thousands of people who all have access to authority with which they could stand up to him, and who are just too craven and cowardly (or complicit) to actually do it.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

We're gonna have to eat a lot of people

[–] griff 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

…in new guidance from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), the agency said it prohibits states "from explicitly or implicitly setting the LCSO [low-cost service option] rate a subgrantee must offer." NTIA officials also made it clear that, even if California obtained the funding, ISPs could exempt themselves from the proposed low-cost broadband bill simply by applying for BEAD funding, Boerner told us. She said the NTIA's new guidance is a "complete farce," since ISPs are getting public money to build infrastructure and won't have to commit to offering low-income plans at specific rates.

”All they would have to do to get exempted from AB 353 [the $15 broadband bill] would be to apply to the BEAD program," she said. "Doesn't matter if their application was valid, appropriate, granted, or they got public money at the end of the day and built the projects—the mere application for the BEAD program would exempt them from 353, if it didn't jeopardize from $1.86 billion to begin with. And that was a tradeoff I was unwilling to make."

[–] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How many "public funding for broadband rollout" rug pulls is that, now? Five? Six?

[–] art@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Wow! So much winning.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] who@feddit.org 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's a mobile phone plan with 5GB/month of data, not a broadband internet service in any reasonable sense.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

That $15 plan was supposed to not have a data cap (for presidential plans, hence broadband)

They've partnered with Musk's Starlink.