this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
98 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38004 readers
822 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

It feels like this is a coordinated ‘long game’ to banning vpns. Kids bypass ‘safety controls’ using a vpn, therefore vpn must be banned to keep kids safe

[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

It is, and the purpose is to prepare for war. In each country the excuse is different, but in all of them people are getting an everincreasing restriction on internet use. See UK for reference

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Would like to see how many companies function without VPN ...

Couldn't do my job without VPN/Wireguard

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They would blacklist consumer VPN IPs and block payments to them, not prevent you from logging in to a corp network.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's rather easy to setup a VPS with a VPN.

so that law would again pretty much accomplish nothing

Politicians and IT... Always a dream team

[–] shrodes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah but you forget, the laws of mathematics don’t apply here.

So clearly Australia has some strong influence such that they could pull this off!

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Australia can still require VPS providers to log IPs. This is the country with the backdooring law, common sense does not apply seemingly.

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

First off, I can't believe YouTube described its content as "high-quality", because most of it isn't. Second off, what the hell did Google expect? They've been doing a piss-poor job at reviewing their content for years and even when they actually do, they don't do it because they want to make the platform more comfortable for kids to use or anything virtuous like that, it was to make the advertisers happy. So yeah, now the governments are involved, tough shit.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Probably high quality compared to Instagram and tiktok

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

au contraire, Youtube shorts are still inescapable hot garbage

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago

Ya not wrong

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Not exactly a high bar to clear.

[–] Gudl@feddit.org 16 points 2 months ago

Its pretty good when Google gets angry. Degoogle yourself

[–] RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

If parents won't do it, someone has to. I have young daughters and the sexist shit that youtube keeps showing young boys has me so nervous for their futures. Youtube in my house is only accessible on the living room TV where I am fully aware of what they are watching.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Are they replacing it with OyYouCuntTube?