That's surprisingly progressive from Illinois
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
223 points (99.6% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
3514 readers
144 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
IL was the first state to legalize marijuana in the state legislature. They also passed no bail legislation. Lots of good things happening in IL, and this is exactly what I would expect.
I'll admit that all I know of IL is being on hold while the Navy found a home for me, and the juggalo I eventually married.
Yeah Especially given the surrounding states. Its kinda good in a way as folks in the surround states come to enjoy a few freedoms. The big problem with illinois is the graft. Grow only allowed for medical which requires a yearly fee. So its does great things but in kinda a weenie bullshit way but its better than not having it.
Grow only allowed for medical ...
I'm kind of okay with that. It's no secret that Illinois had some serious budget issues before legalization. Allowing recreational personal grow would undercut desperately needed tax revenue, and essentially create a bigger black market, not to mention the issue of black market product being adulterated and creating public health concerns. When you go to the weed store, you know what you're getting.
Meh. They limit licenses to assure monopoly. I mean granted its similar with alcohol. I get the state needs money but I don't view legalization as about funding as much as rights. I have to say though that I wish there was severe restrictions on advertising. I actually would like advertising to be restricted to other "adult" industries. So no billboards or ads in papers or online except in the other adult locations. So inside their physical locations and websites. I would also like to not allow online things unless they have a physical presence in the state and they should have to take responsibility for the amount of gambling for a user the same as they would for a physical person at the physical location.
How did this get 15 up votes its just like a completely false opinion. If this said texas sure.
If it wasn't for Chicagoland Illinois would be blood red
Without all the rural areas texas would be blue, what is your point.
If your grandmother had wheels she'd be a bicycle!
today class we're going to learn about per capita.
look at how small all those red dots are. not even by comparison of Chicago. they are small dude.
What makes you say that? We're one of the more progressive states.
Chicagoland is progressive.
Fair enough, but most of the voters live there, which results in progressive policy.
what universe are you from?
Good
It's already illegal to use terms like "therapy" this way in most, if not all, US states. The loophole/grey area they're using is that the existing restrictions use words like "person"/"individual", so by the letter of the law (if you're an idiot) LLMs/bots are exempt
fuck yes.