this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
943 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

9126 readers
2373 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The person who happily answers "yup" to the first two questions isn't going to understand the meaning of "You're a worker."

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago

"I don't wanna lose these chains! They're all that I have!"

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 days ago

The last thing I want to hear is how great capitalism is - as told by someone that capitalism refers to as capital.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 7 points 2 days ago (8 children)

what's wrong with being a worker? Who is this post making fun about?

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

This post is not making fun of workers. Too often we see workers identify with rich capitalists and see their own lack of capital as a personal failing. But once we recognize the difference between the two classes we can dispel ourselves of that notion.

Members of the working class sell their labor in order to gain money and buy the necessities of life. The ruling class buys labor in order to see a profit on the money they already have. Since capitalism compels the capitalist to make a profit, they must pay the worker a fraction of the value that the worker creates. (The business owner wants to stay in business and the shareholders demand every-increasing value.) Hence we should not consider ourselves capitalists: we are workers who are being exploited, as necessitated by the system.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MadBigote@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (14 children)

People thinking they're capitalists.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 86 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Michael would definitely be the one to lack class consciousness, not Pam

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Michael would be aware for everyone, but he would get it wrong constantly

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"I DECLARE SOCIALISM!"

"...you can't just declare socialism."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There are ideological capitalists and capital holders.

There are people who are capital holders who are ideologically left economically, some instances as far as full socialist.

There are people who hold little to no capital at all but believe capitalism is the best possible system.

As a percentage of their respective classes though, the later class traitor is unfortunately more common than the former class traitor.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

lmao OP thinks this is some kind of eye opening epiphany or something. Workers know they're workers, what they need is the realization who represents them and who is the enemy.

The number of "capitalists" with a negative net worth and assets that generate little or no profit is astounding. They're just going through a hard time, though. They're going to be one of the few that makes it.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think we can be both. Most of our pensions depend on it for growth.

Might as well put it with the rich people money, because they rule everything and aren't about to let that shit sink in the long term...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

*wage slave

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's funny how corporations rebranded workers into collaborators and entrepreneurs, and ironic how many idiots fell for that. "No, I'm not a worker, I'm a COLLABORATOR!!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org 30 points 3 days ago (17 children)

There is no such thing as middle class, you're either in the capitalist class or working class.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"There's no such thing as a rectangle, you're either a parallelogram or you're not a parallelogram."

The idea of a middle class has absolutely nothing to do with socialism analysis of class relations; it's simply a measure of quality of life.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

A measure of quality of life quite vague and incalculable because as humans we tend to manage money poorly sometimes in our lives.

The idea of a middle class is just capitalist propaganda to get 9-5 workers who earn significantly more than blue collar workers but look like 0 along with other lesser paid jobs when looking at wealth chart that has Billionaires

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί