this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
76 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

40783 readers
472 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

BRB. Building a wearable that sends out an ultrasonic screech to blow out nearby microphones.

Going to call it "Blow Me."

Edit: looks like they already exist: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2328652-voice-jammer-stops-anyone-from-recording-you-speak/

https://archive.ph/unmYO

Also, paper with more detail: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.08490v1

[–] hbar@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Is there a DIY build somewhere for something like this? From my quick googling I've only seen expensive off the shelf products

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago

inb4 weird techbro convos leak 🥹

[–] mugita_sokiovt@discuss.online 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You don't consent by not using one of those devices, period. On top of that, this should be a massive violation of multiple laws everywhere. Of course, corpos will corpo, and bypass laws at their pleasure.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your consent doesn't matter (legally) in a single-party consent state. Which includes some bigs like New York and Texas. California is a two-party consent state though, so theoretically these people should be informing each other that they are using recording equipment.

[–] mugita_sokiovt@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think you see what I'm getting at yet. What I said was that not buying one of those devices, among others, is the way you don't consent to your 4th Amendment rights being violated. Now, if a device like that is usable with a de-Googled solution, as long as it's hardened right, then at the very least, it shows you don't consent to the corporate spying. Government spying though... good luck with that.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And I'm saying that in many states your lack of consent doesn't matter (legally speaking). Your consent is not required if someone else decides to record with their device.

I don't like it. Just stating that you declining to consent does nothing if someone else records you and gives the recordings to the police. That's not a search of you or your possessions, that's a search of someone else's recording that did not require your consent to be made.

None of this is new, just increasingly insidious and ubiquitous.