this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
83 points (98.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42863 readers
1289 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Because this topic came up in c/technology and I was wondering.

Would this be feasible? How bad would it be to your social life?

I'm looking for these scenarios:

  1. No smartphone, but have a dumbphone and a computer

  2. No phone at all, but have a computer

  3. No smartphone, but have a dumbphone, no computer

  4. Nothing at all

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 2 hours ago

All of those are possible in Japan provided 4 allows having a landline.

That said, you're going to end up using a smartphone anyway since the tax agency will have you do your taxes on a loaner device if you don't have one. Several other things become more time consuming as well.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

If you don't have income option 4 is pretty easy, if you have income and it's not your company where you have accountant that handles everything for you and arrives to your house with money every month it's getting complicated and probably 1,2,3 variants are must.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

They made it impossible since last year by removing all other options for some services.
Technically I could still do without one if I drag a laptop or tablet with me and have internet.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 7 points 19 hours ago

A friend of mine avoids smartphones as he is (rightfully) very concerned with his privacy when it comes to big tech. So he has a PC and a dumbphone.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it's not even about a smartphone, it's about being allowed to access services with said smartphone.

when the ticket machine was removed from a train station in rural sweden and replaced with a note on how to buy tickets online, it instantly locked three types of people out: people who don't have a smartphone, people who don't have a payment card, and tourists. because it required online verification, you basically needed a swedish phone number and id to buy tickets.

this was about eight years ago, so smartphone penetration was lower, but i still think about the people i met at the train station while i desperately tried to order tickets over the phone and kept getting stuck in their automated phone tree. they were basically stuck there.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why would they lock out tourists from public transport?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 27 points 1 day ago

it wasn't intentional. they just didn't think about how to implement it. took them four or five years to fix.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess it depends on how you needed to sign up to buy tickets, but I bought tickets on my phone in Sweden with my smartphone in Sweden with only a valid email address. The app even had an English mode.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 1 day ago

yeah it works nowadays. didn't when they first introduced it.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And did you have a payment card that worked in Sweden? Or was it not needed?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

You needed a payment card of some sort.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sweden is so backwater in it's tries to be forward thinking.

You can't even buy a bus ticket with a visa card (nor cash ofc ofc).

[–] remon@ani.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I bought a train ticket at a ticket machine with cash when I was in Sweden last year.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 7 points 1 day ago

they reinstated the machines on large stations. this one was tiny.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anecdotal evidence.

(I'm Swedish).

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 day ago

depends on the place. you can in stockholm, but not most places.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My mother in law gets by just fine without hers. But then again, she's in Arkansas, so I'm not sure if that counts as a modern, or developed country.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It does not. I have family there and pretty much refuse to visit there lol.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure America is still a developing country.

[–] truite@jlai.lu 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I live in France. I did nothing at all for months, but I had and wanted no social life. I returned to my computer because I wanted it, and to a dumbphone because of banks. Without a phone number, there is a lot of things you can't do with your bank, and I couldn't access to my bank account anymore. I know people with a landline phone and no dumb or smartphone and it's ok for the bank, for now.

I have mail, phone numbers, etc. But what's really annoying is people are always with whatsapp or signal and I can't. I feel left out of lot of things. I'm often the last to know social events.

Edit: and there are lot of services which requires smartphones, even state ones.

[–] netspider@feddit.org 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You can install WhatsApp and Signal in an Android emulator on the computer. We are using BlueStacks for this but there are other choices available. The emulated chat program wants to verify your phone number via SMS, just use your dumb phone and type the code by hand into the computer. That's how my wife used Option #1 and only had social media at home. But as many services that could be used with a NFC/barcode plastic card are transitioning to app only mode this gets harder :-(

[–] truite@jlai.lu 2 points 22 hours ago

Yeah and people can chose another app. I tried a smartphone emulator for Signal, and I'm pretty sure I was the security weakness.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 4 points 19 hours ago

In the US, it's not a requirement. I use my phone for nothing but occasionally making or receiving calls, taking photos, and messaging friends, but all of that could be done without it. I just use it because I have it.

[–] Otherbarry@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 7 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

In the U.S. older people still get by fine without all this stuff. I have family that still has a landline, nothing else, so I guess maybe that's #3 in your list. It does mean they physically have to go to places to get things done (e.g. physically go to a bank).

Older people don't care as much about social life beyond visiting/seeing the people/relatives they've always been seeing. A smartphone isn't required for that.

[–] fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago

I have a coworker that still has an old party line for their landline at the farm and if he wasn't given a company phone he probably wouldn't have one.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago

Oh man I wish my 90 year old parents would go back to a landline. They do not have that ability to use a smartphone.

I am forever trying to tech support for them on that.

Doesn't difficult very much depend on what you think matters? You're instantly missing out on anything app, anything QR-code related (ordering food in some restaurants, links, etc.), membership cards that no longer exist in physical form. Some places sell certain tickets online only and then you may need a printer or you're SOL. I'm sure in missing something so that's not extensive.

But at the same time, if you have a dumb phone, you can still stay in touch with friends and family. You'll be missing out on images being sent that are bigger than 2 pixels. But you wouldn't be completely out of the loop. And if you have an internet ready computer at home or at the next door library, just not on you at all times, I think that's crucial. Without that you're ending up in all sorts of trouble.

I would say it's doable if you are good at not giving F's. If at the same time you only want to use cash or just no credit cards you'll be making your life much harder though.

I'm kind of living the 1) life, I have a degoogled smartphone in eternal airplane mode and only free software apps. So in practice I have none of the apps "required" to live.

In large cities, transportation is getting more and more difficult without uber. Bike/escooter rentals also stopped working without an app. I use osmand on my offline smartphone to find taxi stands, so that's cheating by your standards, but stands are empty these days and the drivers are a bit surprised and comment that "most people order a taxi by phone these days".

I've lost most of my friends when I quit facebook, when we randomly meet we still have a small chat but I don't get invited to events (birthdays etc) any more. Big respect to the few that still don't mind sending an sms or email (and even more respect to the 2 friends who keep an xmpp client with only me as a contact)

Increasingly, I don't know what's going on around me because businesses, libraries etc advertise only on "spotted" on facebook, have presence only on fb, and don't even care about telling the local news about events or openings. I only know about that because of other people who use facebook.

[–] Toes@ani.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't have my first smartphone until my 20s.

I'd imagine it would be similar today. A purse full of maps, important phone numbers in my head, Skype on my computer to talk with my family and friends.

In the early days, I would go to the library to use the computer and Internet.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 day ago

The difference is that, compared to before, a lot of services have shifted from interfacing with a human to interfacing with technology in some way. The ability to interact with a human in person may not be available or will have additional costs.

Same with using cash. A lot of places have become card only because it is cheaper to pay 3% processing fees than to handle the labor costs of dealing with cash, especially in a larger organization.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More and more official / administration things in more and more countries require a smartphone.

So: outright impossible, unless you want to unplug yourself from any "normal" living, earning money etc.

At the very least you make vast amounts of goods and services for unavailable for yourself and weather or not you can find a local aproximate depends entirely on how profitable it is to run that aproximate while the online version still exists.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 3 points 22 hours ago

Tedious but doable as proven by a lot of older people.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I live in Germany. For the moment, i do not require a phone for anything in my life. I use it as an nfc card reader for my ID, but there are usb readers that could replace that. All other things also would continue working without a phone. Email, matrix, osm, music all work on a laptop. I actually have this orangpi + powerbank + usbc touchscreen setup that works basically like a laptop. I could add a sim card module to it too.

"Nothing at all" would mean not being well informed about politics and i think that has moral implications i could not live with. I think "computer only + time limit" is a good idea.

[–] RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Germany is great in this regard, you have coin machines everywhere and the cash and privacy culture seems to be very strong.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

In your four scenarios.

1 is doable the rest are not.

You need a voiceline/phone.

I guess you could use a soft phone.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Does the US count as a "modern-day developed country?" 'Cause if so, it's apparently still possible because my tech-illiterate Boomer parents manage it.

(Okay, they technically have smartphones, mainly because I'm trying to drag them kicking and screaming into the 21st century, but they basically use them for nothing but phone calls and maybe an occasional text message or email. My dad accesses banking stuff via website on his computer, but if he didn't have that I'm sure he'd just be fine going to the counter at the brick-and-mortar branch.)

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

It's entirely possible, depending on what services you want to live without.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Kids and elderly people are already doing all of that, so it is technically possible, but inconvenient. You would also need to outsource your smartphone activities to someone else to actually make it work.

Option 1 seems semi-feasible, but it is getting harder every year. Also, certain activities are already beyond your reach if you’re in this group. As long as you don’t want to do any of those things, you should be fine though.

Option 2 is impossible unless you outsource your phone needs to someone else.

Option 3 is hard, but possible. You would need to limit your activities quite significantly. BTW some homeless people have a dumb phone as their only electronic device. You kinda need to have a phone number in order to barely survive.

Option 4 is the most extreme one. Children and elderly are living like this, but they are also outsourcing everything, so does that count?

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

You need to include Internet in that list. A computer doesn't necessarily have Internet, and though it's more common, it's not guaranteed on a smartphone either. Landlines still also exist. Even if they're VoIP, because voice-only Internet connections for VoIP are a thing.

There are plenty of older folks in categories 1 and 4. And by older I mean old Gen X and Boomers (even a few Silents are still around) mostly. They manage to get by just fine. Things are not quite so far gone that Internet is 100% necessary, though more and more places are trying to force it to cut costs.

I'm in category #1 myself, but as this comment's existence strongly implies, I have Internet. I'd be in #2 but I need the phone occasionally for notifications and 2FA. Also if the Internet goes out, I need to be able to call someone to fix it.

I did these in China.

4 first, poor had nothing, moved to teach English. It was fine, I paid for things with cash, I had a debit card to use the ATMs.

And up until that point I still didn't have any phone, so I climbed the hills behind the apartment I was renting and just walked around town learning stuff, trying for, living life.

Then I got a dumphone, which changed little except I could hang out with close friends from the school but usually we coordinated when we work together in the school anyway, so there was very little change with a dumb phone.

Then I bought a laptop and I could study Rosetta Stone and watch TV/movies.

eventually I got a smartphone and then I could start dating in the modern world. I dated in China before that through organic meetups, but I didn't realize how far into the digital age dating head lapped until I got a smartphone and used all the apps.

It's very feasible and I'll say a lot less stressful to not have a phone, but it's not as anxious-fun, and I do like looking stuff up all the time and having gigabytes of music in my pocket.

which reminds me before I had a laptop or smartphone, I bought a mini iPod in China and used one of the school computers to load it up with music.

Shoot that was a revolution for me, I loved the little clip on the back and how late it was.

How bad would it be for your social life?

I'd say that without the tech you won't make new connections as easily on a surface level, but whenever an unteched person does get into a conversation, their side of the conversation tends to be a bit more well thought out and significant.

You'll also put more work into the real life relationship since you don't have a hundred virtual relationships vying for your attention on your phone.

So it would probably help your social life, by my metrics.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

It depends on what part of the world you live in. At minimum, for the developed world, you'll probably need at least #3 to maintain a job and connectivity with various government and commercial entities.

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

1 & 2 are no problem at all, I did that (2) till a couple of years ago.

[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've done no. 1 a few times for a month or so each. Some of the biggest problems with that are:

  • Banking can be a bit rough without the app. You can sometimes get a separate device to log in from some banks
  • Digital authentication to eg. government services, and some private services as well works via a smarthphone app. Depends on the country a bit how extensive this is, Sweden has been really bad considering this.
  • Sometimes public transit only/mostly sells tickets through an app
  • Digital maps and route planners are very convenient and not having them substantially increases the time and effort you need to put into finding places

What usually won't be a big issue

  • Messaging: Whatsapp, Signal and obviously Facebook Messenger work on the computer, so you won't be fully missing out on anything. Also, SMSs and calling work well and are cheap/free
  • Missing out on social media and digital entertainment like youtube on a device that you carry 100% of the time is probably just a good thing
  • Photography, you can find all kinds of digital cameras, camcorders and DSLRs for a reasonable price

All in all, it's feasible but quite inconvenient at times.

I find having a smartphone without a sim card at home to be a good compromise. It limits the time I spend on my phone, which in itself is nice, and subsequently decreases the amount of data that can be collected of me. Also, if you aren't relying on your phone it doesn't need to be nice and expensive.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The banking side I refuse to use their apps. Either they have a good website that works for a computer or I don’t bank with them. Their loss if they can’t figure out how to build a website.

The authentication services. For like government services. Thank God, there’s nothing around me that does something like that. Or at least nothing that I’ve run . But I guess there is a day like that where I’m going to be screwed on that end. Again make the website work, right and allow me to authenticate somewhere else.

The public transport, I could see a day and age where that might be a problem for me.

Digital maps and route planners, stand on GPS is do exist, but yeah, that one without a smart phone really sucks.

And yes, I do have a smart phone.

[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

My bank and most others here require a smartphone authentication to log in, even if you use the website on the computer.