this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
330 points (98.5% liked)

politics

25300 readers
2751 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He says if Trump continues deporting immigrants at the current rate, inflation will go from 2.5% to somewhere close to 4% “by the time it hits its peak early next year.”

Zandi says his stark prediction is based on recent inflation data. “Foreign-born labor force is declining, and the overall labor force has gone flat since the beginning of the year,” he added. “That’s causing tightening in a lot of markets, adding to costs and inflation.”

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 95 points 3 days ago (3 children)

[x] to doubt. Mostly because I sincerely doubt inflation will "peak" at 4%.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

No no. You misunderstood. They're going to peek at it at 4% then promptly ignore it going higher.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Inflation numbers are already higher than expected. Can't imagine that it's going to be a rosy outlook for inflation over the next few years, or at the very least I wouldn't count on the numbers going down any time soon. Trump won't get his interest rate cut like he wanted so I fully anticipate he will continue to play tariff chicken with the rest of the world and by the time the fucker leaves office the economy will be in a goddamn ruin and the right will get to blame whoever swoops in to clean up the mess again.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 74 points 3 days ago (1 children)

oh no, small farms will go bankrupt and have to sell to larger farms that Trump's friends own... Oops, what an accidental bribe!

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago

Trump's "friends" -- His only known document friend hung himself in prison, allegedly.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

4%? Based on some of the food prices I've seen it's easily 60% over the past 365 days.

Oh right, the magic "you can't count food alone" or energy, or housing, or anything that really matters.

My spouse told me a store was having a "sale" on 2 liters of soda, for $4.29. That has to be higher than I've ever heard. I don't by Coke often but if I was buying a 2 liter $1.99 was expensive a couple years ago. Products like that have to be at 30%+ inflation.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago

We're already going to hit that when the companies run out of domestic stock, and the tariff increases hit - this is just starting now.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This assumes his deportation figures are accurate. I doubt they're deporting 750 people/day.

In order to deport lots and lots of people you actually need other undocumented folks to tattle on the actual bad guys. Except when you deport everyone (including US citizens) you don't get those tattlers anymore. Instead, you get neighborhoods and sometimes entire cities worth of people who will not help ICE in the slightest.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Biden averaged 742 a day without being insane about it... 750 isn't shit when you've thrown all the money in the country at it.. (sigh)

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

not 4% annually, 4% per month.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You can't have inflation, if you stop collecting inflation data. *taps forehead *

[–] tylerkdurdan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

worked out well for Argentina and Greece... /s

[–] Juice@midwest.social 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's so funny, because it means it will raise wages. I will never understand why these people wont just be honest. Economists will go to whatever lengths necessary to avoid making a class analysis.

increased wages leads to inflation, according to the rules of capitalist profit accumulation. Its what happened during covid, when so many people died the "surplus population" that keeps wage growth stagnant was depleted by a meaningful degree. Wages went up, then inflation followed. And we saw that most of that inflation was just companies raising prices so they could make more money.

Obviously the mass deportation of workers is an act of class war, and should be fought against. But it will increase profits for his buddies in the short term, and buy him some political clout among his base in the shorter term. The problem is, who will do those agri jobs which rely on hyper exploited labor, and why? It is going to cause mayhem for masses of workers.

But also, that is the point. He wants to crash our economy on purpose. The endgame is to force an asset bubble onto China and the EU, through a long painful global recession.

So the problem isn't Trump, he is a symptom, an accelerant. As always, the problem is capitalism which dominates every part of our lives.

Look up "reserve army of labor", called "surplus population" by mainstream economists, and the stupidly named "Mara-Lago accords."

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not so sure... Crops are going unpicked and that isn't being solved with increased wages. If Trump does his plan allow farms to treat the remainder workers as serfs we get the worse of both worlds: not enough labor to stabilize food prices and an enslaved work force.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

I also have an inkling in that direction too, and I'm just not an economist. But when he says deporting immigrants will raise inflation, he is saying it will raise wages based on these same mechanics

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sooo you are saying the guy that's pulling the trigger isn't to blame? gtfo

[–] Juice@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

Go ahead and blame him, fuck this guy. I want to see him Moussolini'd. But getting rid of him won't fix the problems. Most of his regressive reforms will stay in place, and continue to worsen, if only at a slower pace.

Maybe try not to assume the dumbest possible interpretation of what someone is saying? Or whatever, idrc

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Where I live (Philly suburbs) you always used to see people playing organized soccer on all the local fields early Sunday mornings yelling in Spanish. Now those fields are always empty.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't be out in public unless I had to if I were a Latino.

[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I passdd through Times Square yesterday. Weekend during summer. Usually packed with teens families and tourists. It was nearing pandemic levels of empty.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

No one is spending

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago

It's going to be difficult to decide how much inflation comes from which bad policy, because there are multiple.

  • Deportations (less production due to workforce reduction)
  • Import taxes on finished goods (less market supply locally)
  • Import taxes on industry inputs (less production locally)
  • Forcing inefficient foreign investment (monetary oversupply for impacted sectors)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago

I’m sure he’ll pull out that sharpie, especially since that’s when J Pow can be legally fired.

[–] mikenurre@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who wants to bet? I've got $100 says it goes above 4% by 6/30/26. Of course that $100 will only be worth about $94.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't bet against economists.

They'll change the calculation and not allow you to change your wager.

i'm an economist (not a good one) and I'm betting fortune's economist is way undershooting

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So unless they remove Powell, Trump isn't getting his rate cut.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

And they don't have the power to do that

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

That's all?

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago