this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
495 points (89.2% liked)

Comic Strips

18843 readers
1509 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

It won't take the CO2 out of the air, and as they produce just enough food for their own use, a few billion people will starve. Never mind.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

We've gone too far. We can't stop this, we can only stop making it worse and learn to adapt to a changing world climate. The natural global processes of the planet have been altered and they are in the process and chaos of shifting into new normals. How long will it take to stabilize? No one knows. This kinda thing has happened to the planet before, but it happens to be quite catastrophic to the life living on it when it does. The jet stream is collapsing and major ocean currents are shifting. We have absolutely no control over these things and it's already started. Everything on the planet is connected to these natural processes. It's why things were the way they were, climate wise. Not anymore!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

maybe inspired by this comment? https://lemmy.ca/comment/18397539

I've seen so much degrowth spam/trolling yesterday. This is organized hopelessness in favour of a hopeless failure of a solution. The only degrowth that will ever occur is through mass war/murder. It is a massive resource/diesel investment to conduct the mass destruction/murder. It takes a very dark soul to support degrowth, because it simply has no implementation path based on everyone voluntarily internalizing BP's carbon footprint personal responsibility.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Acidbath@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

has anybody seen breaking amish? that show is amazing

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›