this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
536 points (98.7% liked)

News

31781 readers
3571 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Empathy is usually regarded as a virtue, a key to human decency and kindness. And yet, with increasing momentum, voices on the Christian right are preaching that it has become a vice.

For them, empathy is a cudgel for the left: It can manipulate caring people into accepting all manner of sins according to a conservative Christian perspective, including abortion access, LGBTQ+ rights, illegal immigration and certain views on social and racial justice.

“Empathy becomes toxic when it encourages you to affirm sin, validate lies or support destructive policies,” said Allie Beth Stuckey, author of “Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion.”

Stuckey, host of the popular podcast “Relatable,” is one of two evangelicals who published books within the past year making Christian arguments against some forms of empathy.

The other is Joe Rigney, a professor and pastor who wrote “The Sin of Empathy: Compassion and its Counterfeits.” It was published by Canon Press, an affiliate of Rigney’s conservative denomination, which counts Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth among its members.

These anti-empathy arguments gained traction in the early months of President Donald Trump’s second term, with his flurry of executive orders that critics denounced as lacking empathy.

As foreign aid stopped and more deportations began, Trump’s then-adviser Elon Musk told podcaster Joe Rogan: “The fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy.”

Even Vice President JD Vance, a Catholic convert, framed the idea in his own religious terms, invoking the concept of ordo amoris, or order of love. Within concentric circles of importance, he argued the immediate family comes first and the wider world last — an interpretation that then-Pope Francis rejected.

While their anti-empathy arguments have differences, Stuckey and Rigney have audiences that are firmly among Trump’s Christian base.

“Could someone use my arguments to justify callous indifference to human suffering? Of course,” Rigney said, countering that he still supports measured Christ-like compassion. “I think I’ve put enough qualifications.”

Historian Susan Lanzoni traced a century of empathy’s uses and definitions in her 2018 book “Empathy: A History.” Though it’s had its critics, she has never seen the aspirational term so derided as it is now.

It’s been particularly jarring to watch Christians take down empathy, said Lanzoni, a graduate of Harvard Divinity School.

“That’s the whole message of Jesus, right?”

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 13 points 3 days ago

Being hateful bigots is also a sin.

[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Empathy was dead in the church when they didn't back BLM. That's when I lost my religion.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Many churches did back BLM and still do. There are actually many who actually read the Bible and don't just listen to MAGA nutjobs and cultish leaders. They're just not as loud (that's kinda the point... The Bible talks about that, too)

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

Ima atheist but I recognize many churches did and many did not and many were indifferent.

[–] halfsalesman@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago

I might be an atheist's atheist, but if you are anti-empathy you aren't christian, you just like old testament for it's prejudice and horror.

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 10 points 3 days ago

What we don’t understand, we fear. What we fear, we judge as evil. What we judge as evil, we attempt to control. And what we cannot control…we attack.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I can't understand how these people can still look at themselves in the mirror. I guess I'm not very empathetic.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

most of them are probably attending televengical churches, and only hearing a curated version of a bible verse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago
[–] manxu@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is plain and simple in the Bible: empathy is a function of skin color. The whiter the skin, the more empathy is a virtue; the darker, the more it is a sin. I don't understand what's so difficult about it.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

🎵 "I believe that in 1978 God changed his mind about black people!" 🎵

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Religions have all way overstayed their welcome. Time to go.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That’s kind of what this all is. There’s less interest in religion so when a political party hijacks it and calls their bullshit a religion, it goes unchallenged. There’s only people who still care about religion are the control freaks who want to weaponize it.

[–] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

The problem is that there are still too many people that believe in religion. I'd love to see the day when someone mentions religion as a way to justify what they are saying and everyone just laughs at them.

Stuckey, host of the popular podcast “Relatable,” is one of two evangelicals who published books within the past year making Christian arguments against some forms of empathy.

Naming podcasts sarcastically has officially gone too far.

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think the root of this is a misunderstanding of Subsidiarity. Problems should be solved by the nearest, most local competent party available. That means I don't barge in and try to solve another family's problems when they are capable of solving them theirselves. The federal government shouldn't regulate signs in my residential neighborhood. Neither should the state. It should be the local government, my neighborhood association, of me making a decision for myself.

Nowhere in subsidiarity are we understood to be relieved from the moral obligation to be charitable. Yes, if your funds are limited, you direct them to the area of your greatest competence & the greatest need. Give a coat to your neighbor next door before you give a coat to someone across town ... but if you have the funds for two coats, give them both.

I think the bottom line is if your heart is in loving your neighbor, you are going to get it right. If it isn't, you'll find something in the above as an excuse to not give a care about someone else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Religion is the absolute seed of all that's wrong here.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No. (Organized) Religion is just a symptom of it.

The issue is fascism and totalitarianism. Religion is just one of the many methods that The State has historically used to control people and enrich itself. Most people are aware of the idea that "don't eat meat on Fridays but DO eat fish that we have monetary investment in" was a thing. But lent itself did a LOT to sell olive oil (because it wasn't animal based) which... let's just say that there is a reason that olive trees are so intrinsically tied to "the holy land".

And same here. Empathy is a great thing to preach when you are building a community. But "empathy for the wrong people is a sin" is a great way to mobilize against said "wrong people".

But if it wasn't religion it would be something else. All the people across the river are redheads so redheadedness is an indication they are unclean and diseased but also their wives and daughters are hot so... Shit like phrenology was used to mobilize "science" against The Other. And so forth.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It’s a sin if it costs them anything at all. But if it’s their house swept up by a tornado, look who starts praying and asking for everything.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›