"And how would you define 'inappropriate setting'?"
"Well, I'd introduce Donald and Jeffrey to an unaccompanied minor, leave the room and close the door. Nothing inappropriate that I saw..."
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
326 points (98.2% liked)
politics
25384 readers
2678 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The children were always female. None of that gay stuff.
Honestly this could be an avenue to get him to slip up. Push the rumor that it was boys or even adult men and watch him go full on Alpha^TM^ and correct the record to girls.
Watch him just get mad and not correct it at all lol
Except she didn't leave the room, she stayed and raped children.
Lol, Jeff must feel like such a silly goose. He killed himself over absolutely nothing, you silly billy.
Lol he didn't kill himself.
Woosh
So she's saying she never met trump, because the presence of either of them immediately creates an inappropriate setting.
When you're a professional assistant child predator nothing is inappropriate.
Yep. Anything incriminating would be admitting her own guilt.
Says the person from jail, convicted for the same inappropriateness.
One felon denies seeing the other felon commit further crimes.
I can believe that... If I was a fucking retard.
Of course she'd say that. Trump's been hinting pardon the whole time.
She's already been sent to a low security jail where she gets out during the day. She has already received a bribe of some sort.
This is so stupid. Here's the other quote from the article you need to keep in mind:
Maxwell insisted she was unaware of any sexual contact between Epstein and minors or any other type of “non-consensual” sexual activity. But she said she now recognizes some of those things may have happened outside her presence.
“I’m not saying that Mr. Epstein did not do those things,” she said. “I don’t feel comfortable saying that today, given what I now know to be true. So I am not here to defend him. But what I can say is that I did not participate in that activity.”
Maxwell also acknowledged Epstein’s interest in women changed over time, moving toward younger women and even teenagers.
“I never understood that change to encompass children. I did see from when I met him, he was involved … however you want to characterize it, with women who were in their 20s. And then the slide to, you know, 18 or younger looking women. But I never considered that this would encompass criminal behavior,” she said.
So good news! Epstein is innocent too. He never did anything criminal! Completely credible testimony from a completely credible witness.
You’d have to be so stupid, so breathtakingly dense, so galactically thick, so cosmically brain-deficient that if ignorance were gravity, you’d be a black hole pulling in common sense from light-years away to believe this shit.
So yea... Magats will fully believe this.
There's no such thing as an inappropriate setting to her
Bingo
So wait we are going to listen to her after trumps lawyer talked to her and gave her a new place to nap, but we wont listen to the victims of her crimes that said otherwise.
I have a sneaky suspicion that this bitch is fucking lying.
Depends. What's her definition of an "inappropriate setting"?
I would think nothing is more appropriate for Epstein Island, than to rape teenage girls.
When in Rome...
Just because you believe diddling kids isnt in appropriate...
Wait, what year is it?
Well, the unbiased, reliable source of factual information Ghislaine Maxwell has spoken. Guess that's that.
Reminds me of the former football player Franz Beckenbauer: "I saw no slaves in Katar"
Nothing to see here, please disperse. Absolutely nothing to see here.
Probably the single most believable witness in the history of the world.
Bigly.
Oh. Well that settles that. After all, she'd know.
right, sure thing.
She seems honest. /s
Define inappropriate setting
Well she would say that, wouldn't she?
Riiiiiiight.
That's a surprising headline from Politico, they're owned by douchebags.
Someone lost a bet probably.
So the lying liar, we all know is a liar, is totally lying.
What a fucking liar
lol