this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
6 points (71.4% liked)

news

62 readers
680 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 5 days ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Possible? Probably. But will it happen? That's about as likely as your next bowel movement accelerating a turd past 1 c.

It is necessary for capitalism to continue to exist. But I don't believe their inexhaustible avarice will allow them to do the rational thing.

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago

sigh - UBI is possible even before "ai" in fact UBI helps growth, just not for the ultra-rich. it is just another bait to say "hey llm shit is good four you poors I promiise"

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It's possible now if tax rates were scaled to be similar to how much advantage and protection the govt provides to each person and corporation.

[–] dax@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

"just one more big innovation, then we can all work less." Yes sure, we've heard that before.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's feasible now.

LLMs are a bubble.

[–] SanctimoniousApe 1 points 3 days ago

Which is probably why they're quoting a "former" researcher.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

AI will take all the energy. Humans will be ~~happy~~ lucky if they get $500 for food.