this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
55 points (78.4% liked)

memes

16997 readers
4875 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bruhh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

yet another yogurt

[–] ComradeNokotan@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I saw someone on ml point out that update should come before upgrade

Sauce

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

update pulls the metadata about your packages (to see if there are new versions, and which), while upgrade applies the patches.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I've never understood why the update part isn't included in the upgrade command, since upgrade is useless without it

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 53 minutes ago

Upgrade will upgrade the system to whatever is newest in your package cache. If, for example, you've just performed a partial upgrade and put yourself into an unsupported state, running upgrade without first running update will put your system back in line with itself.

There probably almost never a reason for this, but its the equivalent of running pacman -u which under normal circumstances you will never do

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

presses the big blue 'update' button in GNOME Software in Fedora

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 2 points 39 minutes ago

Checks 'automatic updates' box in Discover

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

You don't even have to use the aur are to have breaking changes. Most recently they changed how vlc was packaged. And broke it causing a lot of problems for users.

[–] NukeNPave@lemmy.world 2 points 51 minutes ago

Or the Linux firmware package change that required manual intervention to resolve.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's pretty rare. I ran arch for years and my only issues were from AUR or trying to update extremely out of date machines.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I've run arch for years as well. It happens nearly yearly. I've had updates break completely several times. Partial updates. That required significant manual intervention. Etc Etc Etc. Meanwhile my Debian and fedora systems haven't had a hitch in years.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I've moved on to gentoo. All the customization and if something breaks I can be sure it's my fault.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I haven't installed gentoo in 20 years. I still like arch for it's glaring flaws. And I do like BSDs ports etc. I probably should go through a gentoo install again to see how it changed. Last time I ran it. Was on a first generation Pentium.

[–] flemtone@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

I find debian more stable than arch, especially when updating.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 24 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Really should keep that PPA use to a minimum. They're potentially a source of not just instability but possible malware as you're putting a lot of trust in whoever maintains that resource.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Especially because there is no way to limit the packages installed from a PPA AFAIK. If the PPA has a "new" version of NGINX, or of libc, or of Wayland - you get it, too!!!

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Absolutely. Ideally you should have zero PPAs. There’s definitely a cost for using this feature. Most commonly it comes in the form of instability when you end up with incompatible or broken packages because the maintainer wasn’t playing an active enough role. YMMV!

[–] zorro@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You can set packages from a particular repo to a lower priority so that they are only installed when you expressly ask for them

[–] manxu@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

How does one do that, Wise Zorro?

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 4 points 12 hours ago

When I use Debian/Ubuntu, I prefer installing missing/outdated software from Nix package manager or Flatpaks.

This way, I can keep a stable core, while being able to enjoy all the latest versions of the apps that I need.

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)
nix flake update
nixos-rebuild --switch --flake .

# Just to keep an update history
git add flake.lock
git commit -m "update"

This may seem like too much work, but it guarantees an all-or-nothing procedure. If some package is broken, the entire upgrade process is canceled, and the system remains in the state that it was.

I have had a couple of partial upgrade cases on Arch. It was not fun live booting to repair it, every time this happened.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I've had updates fail on NixOS. A kernel update didn't generate the initramfs and the system wouldn't boot. Booting to a previous generation and reapplying the update fixed it.

This is very rare, though, and unlike Arch can be fixed without a Live USB.

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 2 points 1 hour ago

A kernel update didn't generate the initramfs

This sounds like a bug on Nix configuration, or the kernel build process.

If NixOS had caught the error, you wouldn't have gotten a faulty generation at all. This is different from pacman/apt/dnf, which will happily continue the upgrade, resulting in a broken system with no easy way to fix it.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

Break your system and it's broken.

How unexpected!

[–] alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)