this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
1403 points (98.1% liked)

pics

24428 readers
1954 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 3 points 7 hours ago

Aww that's so sweet. They really enjoyed their stay at the AirBnB.

/s

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 6 points 9 hours ago

Get rid of air bnb and similar. It's caused a ton of problems in Japan as well with people buying whole buildings and pricing out existing tenants. There are legal protections, but most tenants, particularly elderly, don't know about them and either pay new increased prices by the new landlord or move out. The government enacted laws requiring a minpaku (think lodging/hotel) license and putting maxes on time, but tons of people still run illegal ones.

A lot of those people seem to be Chinese investors running them off of other sites which has furthered anger and xenophobia against all foreigners. One of the parties that skyrocketed in the most recent election wants to strip property rights from all foreigners and not just investment properties but ALL properties. It's a reaction to getting priced out and the government not doing shit about it. Granted, there are tons of other problems (prices rising weekly or monthly, wages not keeping up at all with inflation and rising prices, and overtourism more generally), but this is low-hanging fruit.

As someone who just bought a house last year (on the market for over a year in the countryside with farmland for which I had to interview and get permits to buy and use), and volunteers in his community, this is terrifying to me. I had to go through tons of extra hoops just for being a foreigner to begin with and now, thanks to fuckhead illegal hotel owners and bad policy, now lots of people want to take the one little bit of stability I finally felt.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 37 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

An important population we need to increase is ethical landlords.

And by ethical, I mean former.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The only good landlord is a former landlord.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

I have a pretty good landlord. This isn't an ACAB situation. The problem is the market, IMO, if not capitalism entirely; even if you got rid of landlords (made it illegal to have tenants), housing prices would still be too high to buy a house. Supply-side or demand-side economics are the only viable solution under capitalism.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (5 children)

Yeah, and there will always be a demand for temporary housing. Even if every person has property, tourists need places to stay, you'd need a place to stay if your house is leveled by a natural disaster, it doesn't make sense to jump through all the hoops of property ownership if you just want to be closer to mom's nursing home in her final months, etc.

The problem isn't filling that need, it's making a profit off it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 hours ago

We could still have great property managers without landlords. Then you wouldn't even need to be thankful that your lord happens to be one of the benevolent ones.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

All landlords are bastards

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

..no, that's just what I said is not the case. You must have misread?

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Looking at the instances you two are from I feel like I'm taking crazy pills 🫨

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago

Sorry, I forgot to tell you that today is opposite day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 39 points 23 hours ago (17 children)

Funny how if you remove all landlords no one loses their home.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 23 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think it can be generally said that the US and their success stories are a force for the bad in the world.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 18 points 18 hours ago

All the high profile multi-billion dollar tech companies to arise in the last 15-20 years have been some form or other of using technology to skirt existing regulations and to move the risk and expense onto others.

PayPal, Uber, Airbnb, DoorDash, you name it, their "innovations" weren't any kind of innovation in technology, they were innovations in creative ways to make something 5% more convenient at the expense of making it 500% worse all round for everyone.

[–] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Your neighbor was your friend... Until they sold out. ..

load more comments
view more: next ›