This article gets it.
The default to governments like this is an invasive surveillance state. To not implement full invasive data collection and simply forbid minors from being online is to be in the wrong.
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
3732 readers
51 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
This title is gold.
Can I call this vibe-lawyering?
This is vibes based legal theory.
This AG is either a total fucking idiot, or cravenly just doing a 'the law is what I say it is' power grab.
Oh well, not like the US legal system generally has any shred of consistency or credibility left to it anyway.
All law is vibes