this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
633 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

36460 readers
1900 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Decentralized social network Mastodon says it can’t comply with Mississippi’s age verification law — the same law that saw rival Bluesky pull out of the state — because it doesn’t have the means to do so.

The social non-profit explains that Mastodon doesn’t track its users, which makes it difficult to enforce such legislation. Nor does it want to use IP address-based blocks, as those would unfairly impact people who were traveling, it says.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 46 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Last time i checked "states rights" didn't mean the right to impose your laws on people or businesses running out of other states.

If anyone from Mississippi wants to use our services I'm totally ready to ignore any and all laws that don't acknowledge to sovereignty of the net.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Last I checked, “rights” now means “my right to control you”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago

"Mississippi has a backwards-ass age verification requirement. We're not allowed to let users in from Mississippi. Verify you're not in Mississippi"

Also states don't have one company to go after. It is nearly impossible to track down and file court orders for if your lucky non-profits in other countries.

Like I don't think there are many people that host Mastodon instances that will listen to a court order out of the goodness of there heart.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

* 10,000

Some lawyer on Capitol Hill: "Hmm..."

Not if, when.

Who knows, the same demand may be given of certain other federated social media sites in a few months.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

States should just create a firewall, and not shift burden to supply chains.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 22 points 14 hours ago

Well they should not do that either, but if they're going to, they should shoulder the burden.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›