this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
144 points (98.6% liked)

PhilosophyMemes

241 readers
4 users here now

Memes must be related to phil.

The Memiverse:
!90s_memes@quokk.au
!y2k_memes@quokk.au
!sigh_fi@quokk.au

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is ethical for someone to act in their own self-interest. With that in, the ethical choice is to pick the runway. Gotta get a higher score,

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you usually have a better chance using a runway, even during a crash

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

Bare minimum, fire & rescue has easier, nearly-instant access.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hit the 5 on the runway. Because the farmer om the runway is doing nothing wrong hes chilling but the 5 farmers on the runway shouldn't be there and so the blame is on them.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This, even though if we're really gonna crash, a field is preferred to a runway since it is softer and has more means of dissipating energy. Sometimes you have to be brave and make sscrifices to punish the guilty.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago

If you can get a good glide slope right before touchdown, I feel like a runway is preferred, assuming you had time to fuel dump.

You'll slide easier on a runway. A field could let you sink in far enough to start digging in and ripping things/flipping things.

I say this as someone who took physics in highschool, has a fascination with plane crashes, and dabbles in rc planes. So basically I'm an expert in full size plane crashes. (I have no idea what I'm talking about but it makes sense to me)

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

In case really nobody caught it, this is a trolley problem meme.

[–] nocturne@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

why are 5 farmers on a runway

According to your screenshot they are in a field, presumably near the runway.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What? According to the screenshot, there's one farmer in the field, and five on the runway. Or, at least, one near a field and five near a runway, but it definitely doesn't say there are five farmers in a field.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even if the plane can steer and choose to hit either of the two "groups", they have to be physically near one another. The runway must be right at the field, which implies it being a route the farmers take to get to their fields.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right, because planes can only crash in tiny areas directly near them and it's impossible for a disabled aircraft to glide for large distances. And there couldn't be a situation in which the plane is flying over a city and has to choose between a field and a runway which are on opposite sides of town. Possibly a field with one guy working in it which is further away and a runway at an old landing strip which is now hosting an antique tractor show with five attendees that is closer to the plane.

You make it sound like the plane is driving down the highway with no wings.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait, this seems to be a matter of different perspectives.

It depends on how far they are from crashing, when they have to make the decision.

You seem to have the plane at more distance, with them having more time to access the situation and decide in time if they hit place A or B.

In my head, i was seeing them about to crash in a few hot seconds, when they had to decide.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

If there's a flight attendant running around asking opinions, I'd say they've got plenty of altitude

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was going to ask "5 what on the runway?"

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, units are important.