this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
254 points (99.2% liked)

politics

25623 readers
3058 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hegar@fedia.io 85 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

"Accused" is being used as a euphemism for "caught on camera".

He complained to the restaurant that the ice cream had been drugged, so they checked the camera and saw him doing it.

Immoral and stupid, a truly republican plan.

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Less "euphemism" and more technically correct legal term. It hasn't been proven in a court of law, and he hasn't publicly admitted guilt, even though there is (allegedly) film of him doing it. And to be clear I'm not saying he didn't do it, he very obviously did, but news sites (good ones) have to be specific with their statements.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We really need a better word for "did it, but a court hasn't found them guilty."

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe he wanted to manufacturer an excuse for ICE to arrest foreign-born citizens employed there. Hypothetically.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, he was trying to rape his granddaughters (being a Republican- obviously this was what he was all about), they found the pills, and he tried to deflect by blaming it on the service workers.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago

I hate that both are equally likely.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 1 week ago

I guarantee it. That it something equally shitty.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm trying to understand wtf the plan was here

First off, he actually had cocaine and MDMA from somewhere?

Then he put them in ice cream

...then he complained they received the ice cream that way?

Like, wtf would be the point of that? Or did someone else catch him and he just blamed someone else...?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

It's a safe guess that the end game was molestation, but something interfered with his plan to interfere with the girls.

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Another article:

Further details revealed that Yokeley and the young ladies involved went to a Dairy Queen that night, close to the business’s closing time. Willett said the 16-year-old step-granddaughter was driving the vehicle after leaving the ice cream shop.

Not long after, the two girls found blue pressed pills in their ice cream. Willett said due to “concern, fear, and panic,” the step-granddaughter pulled into a nearby Sheetz gas station when she spotted an EMS vehicle and alerted paramedics of the situation on the spot.

So, he put drugs in before one of the kids was going to drive.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks for the link to additional info. Sounds like he was definitely trying to harm them and they were lucky to find the pills and that the granddaughter was driving and saw that paramedics were there to pull over and contact. Who knows what might have happened if he had been driving--he might have gone on to Plan B.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Plan-B is what he would have put in their ice cream the next day after he's done with Cosby night.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is just a LIBRUL WITCH HUNT! Who CARES if he Put COCAINE in his Granddaughter's Ice Cream? There's STILL Brown People that HAVENT been Arrest yet! PROTECT THE CHILDREN! I'm NOT in a Cult!

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

If only the academy awards had a category for best punching sound effects

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

I am shocked. SHOCKED! Well... I guess not that shocked.... At all...

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Honestly, forget the party affiliation because his position amounts to a nothing burger.

The fact that this horrible person put cocaine and mdma in their ice cream is fucking insane, if true.

[–] mcbenavides85@piefed.social 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They have video of him doing it. He tried blaming someone else.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Idiot was probably trying to manufacture an incident to further some party narrative...

[–] mcbenavides85@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

Probably saw a brown kid behind the Dairy Queen counter.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or he was trying to fuck his granddaughter.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

That was my first thought too but I don't think cocaine and MDMA make sense in that context

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hell, no, Republicans have a pedophilia problem with a P, starting with the fucking big man himself, it comes down from the top, whatthe fuck are you talking about?

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 2 points 1 week ago

I mean it's literally in the nickname the use for themselves. G.rumpy O.ld P.edophiles

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

why would he be roofying his granddaughter, I wonder.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you'd read the article (I know, a lot to ask), you'd see he was doing it to set up employees of the ice cream shop for the fall

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

My reading skills may have deteriorated, but nowhere did I see that in this article.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Amazingly the headline is underselling what he was really doing.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Is granddaughter gave him headline?

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I guess this guy’s planning a run for prez.

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Epstein's Law: every accusation from a Conservative [of being guilty of a thing] is a confession [of being guilty of the thing]

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I still had young kids, I wouldn't want any Republican near them.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't want any of my relatives around these freaks, and no matter how old my kids get, I definitely don't want them near Republicans.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I thought it said debugging for a moment and was about to say something about the DMCA.