37
Ofcom Refuses to Investigate GB News Over Call to Shoot Disabled Benefit Claimants
(bylinetimes.com)
Average GB News rot
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)
United Kingdom
5450 readers
355 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
To be honest a call to kill disabled claiment is less an ofcom broadcast issue. Then a police incitement of violence/riot issue.
I mean it is clearly both and ofcoms answer is very much as expected given the current govs attitude to the right wing. And as someone who holds an ofcom licence (ham).I am fucking disgusted with them and will complain officially.
But the police duty to arrest the presenters for calling for viewers to hunt down and kill disabled people. Drastically outweighs the broadcast licence issue.
Anyone who saw the show should be calling the Met Police and reporting a crime.
As a disabled person would it be okay to shoot reformers since they think it's okay to shoot us?
Nope Sorry.
A GB news presenter is not all reformers, (yet)
Added to UK law on self defence is very anti predictive risk as a motive. You would be required to show the reformer had a gun or some other intent to harm you. More accurately that you had reasonable cause to feel threatened.
Now if reformers actually started doing so. iE you had evidence that GB news presenters had been successful in inciting such attacks.
You would still need to show evidence you though the reformer was going to attack.
So no shooting random reformers presenting no evidence of holding a weapon or aggression. But you would have a much easier time convincing a jury etc that you thought his fishing rods were a riffle.
I hope this advice helps with any decisions you may be forced to make.
Yeah, was a joke in jest. It's just sickening they are allowed to say that without legal repercussions. Cheers
I thought this was going to be an Archenemy cover of a Manowar song
Haven't heard of those
Good thing I was sat on the toilet when I clicked that link