this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
230 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8529 readers
429 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 75 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Being against genocide is pretty controversial these days...

[–] KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So... Never Again™ actually means only the Jews. Got it.

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago

Never Again is a phrase popularised by zionist terrorist Kahane in the 70s, the original phrasing used by holocaust survivors was never forget

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So now the message is to be scared to stand up for what is right?

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Always has been.

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What the hell? So “Never Again” doesn’t actually mean “Never again” anymore?

What the fuck is wrong with everyone these days?

[–] hackerwacker@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

It never did mean that though.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago

“Never again” can’t mean never again for Palestinians.

[–] ettyblatant@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

The language in this is almost hilarious in just how hard they're trying to throw someone under the bus. This was something they thought of, and pre-planned what, before the genocide? And then they have taken actions internally and fired so-and-so for it because it was all their fault!? Gosh, what a pickle!

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So their new slogan gonna be “ok, maybe just this one more time…for now.”

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

It’s different when we do it

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago

Yeah, and it's bullshit that they did. Cowards

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago
  • Never again under my discretion only
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't get it, what was the message sent by the first post?

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It seemed to acknowledge that peoples other than Jews can also be victims of genocide.

This is considered controversial because Israel, which attempts to position itself as representing Jewish interests, is perpetrating a genocide on non-Jews as we speak. They deny that they are committing genocide.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well but if they deny they're committing genocide then they still can be against genocide right?

This is a rhetorical statement btw
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree with your rhetorical statement, but I think I'm missing some implication.

It's a true statement, I just don't understand what you're pointing out.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Rhetorical because they're fucking hypocrites who believe that killing Palestinians is the right thing to do so they get to do whatever they want.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

ohh, that makes more sense. I thought it meant never again but just for the Jews, otherwise it's okay. Actually my take seems more accurate currently

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

It's a variant of

Never Again Means Never Again For Anyone

Which is used these days to protest the Holocaust perpetrators supporting Israel.

[–] marcela@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

It was too woke for them. It features People of Color.