this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
423 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

39770 readers
252 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SMH @ activists using techno-fascist platforms for communications during an operation subject to state-actor level interference. I thought we recognised and acknowledged this problem 15-20 years ago already.

https://xcancel.com/CraigMurrayOrg/status/1965431513320927706

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] incentive@lemmy.ml 85 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I use WhatsApp cautiously with friends who still refuse to jump over to Signal (let alone Matrix or Session). But it's def mind blowing to read an activist group was relying on it for organizing. Reminds me of FB being used for organizing G20 and BLM demos -_-

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Considering their entire marketing campaign is "nobody, not even WhatsApp can see your messages," I can see how folks would fall for that.

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

But they can see the metadata!

[–] ctry21@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think a lot of non-techie people only know signal from the Trump admin using it illegally earlier in the year. In a lot of people's minds because of that they think Signal = insecure because they don't get the nuances of why using it in that specific context -- on personal phones, using a third party app, with a random journalist in the mix -- was bad, but that for most people it's still one of the best options. WhatsApp on the other hand has a lot of marketing around it and if you didn't know that Meta is Facebook I think some people wouldn't even realise who the owners are.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had a friend who heard signal was backdoored and that a regular old cell call was more secure. Had to correct that

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

wasn't it telegram that got hacked?
also i vaguely remember the signal ceo getting sued or something because they couldn't/wouldn't let some government body read someone's messages, because it's encrypted

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 72 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, based on the source, they're still even on Twitter which is a lot more overtly fascist than WhatsApp. So…yeah…

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are some unofficial pages on the fediverse: https://mastodon.bida.im/@globalsumudflotilla

But yeah no links or mentions to mastodon and federated platforms on their website

https://globalsumudflotilla.org/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 week ago

A sad reality of political activism is the inability of many groups to follow proper opsec.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

WhatsApp Supports starving children to death

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

The number of people who are like "are you on Whatsapp? " fir secure conversations....

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's curious. I'd think they'd be prepared with Signal at the very least and some backup self-hosted channel, as well as cameras and backup cell hotspots.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they were prepared for the drone hit the other day; so hopefully for this as well.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd imagine they could have a few spread out boats further and further behind, each with its own cell hotspot, beaming WiFi all around, so that they have to be jammed simultaneously to stop the livestreams from capturing the attacks.

[–] randompasta@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

Or fiber optic cable.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

it sounds like it would be easier to pick them off one-by-one if they were far apart.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is why you don't use whatsapp

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 25 points 1 week ago

This is yet another reason why you don't use whatsapp

ftfy

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meta is complicit in the genocide

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

Not the first genocide, either

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe consider Signal instead?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Did they select Whatsapp as a main communication channel and direct their supporters to it?

Or did they just start a group chat to reach out to supporters who were already on the app?

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

100% CIA and mossad were watching those channels realtime.

[–] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

I am pretty sure those groups were public

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Amazing that they weren't using Signal for comms outside their group, but for internal comms it's even more amazing they weren't using something like Meshtastic.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Can only say a person who has never used meshtastic.

Source: The struggle.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Thank you for telling me about meshtastic!

For anyone like me who never heard of it before:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meshtastic

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Amazing that they weren’t using Signal

I wouldn't rule it out. But you can't do public comms over Signal.

it’s even more amazing they weren’t using something like Meshtastic.

Again, I wouldn't rule it out. But if I'm on a public group that's very likely compromised by the IDF, I'm not going to announce all the other protocols they need to block.

He's just reporting one avenue that's been closed to the protesters by a corporate entity that is now complicit in genocide.

[–] Shamber@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

With all respect to a privacy advocates(I'm one), but blaming them on using WhatsApp is besides the point, these people are not trying to hide their activities, or locations, and many of them are not tech-saavy, the shame is on the cess pool that is Meta, and all the other goons...this is so fucked up on so many levels.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

blaming them on using WhatsApp is besides the point

WhatsApp admins are explicitly interfering with a public protest in order to satisfy a genocidal foreign government.

This is at least as big a deal as TikTok censorship of anti-China posters. It's just on behalf of a US ally, so we're defending it rather than threatening to interfere in their business practices in turn.

the shame is on the cess pool that is Meta

Who appoints WhatsApp administration heads if not Meta? It's the same picture.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

So happy not to be using Whatsapp...

[–] appropriateghost@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

another reason why not to use whatsapp? for all that is good, don't use meta or any corporate technofascist company. there are better options.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

All the more reason to use Signal.

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

At least they werent organising on discord, maybe its intentional to send a message to people about meta

[–] warm@kbin.earth 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Was this their main channel of communication or just a group they had for supporters?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Damn, didn’t know Nitter still existed.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›