this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
19 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

552 readers
253 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

  1. No paywalled sites at all.
  2. News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
  3. No external video links, only native(.mp4,...etc) links under 5 mins.
  4. Post only direct links.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.

Encouraged:

Misc:

Relevant Communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Comments

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SinTan1729@programming.dev 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I haven't met a single person in the last 5 years who wanted a slimmer phone. Phones are already slim enough. We just want longer battery life.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

They don't want them and yet they will buy them. The personal opinion is completely irrelevant to a brand if no action is taken by the opinion holder. If people who want thicker phones bought thicker phones, there'd be more thick phones on the market, yet they buy slim phones so more slim phones are produced.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Good news for you — everything but the camera bump and the screen is battery. 22 to 27 hours on a full charge. And if that’s not good enough, there’s an external battery you can stick to the back.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That is not good enough. In fact, I would go so far as to say 22 to 27 hours is insultingly low. Phones used to last a fucking week without a charge. In my opinion, there has yet to be a feature on smartphones that I feel justifies the massive drop in battery life they've tried to pass off as "normal" now.

[–] SinTan1729@programming.dev 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I hear it every time, but most of my phones barely survive a full day's use. (I've used flagships from pretty much every brand. The only ones that have adequate battery life are brands like Oppo and Vivo, but I don't like them for different reasons.) If they weren't obsessed about making phones as slim as possible, it should be possible to put in even more battery life, so that people like me (and I'm probably not a minority, I hear people complain about this a lot) could have 30% battery left at the end of a normal day, and could be confident about using their phone more on more demanding days (e.g. need to shoot videos, or long video calls).

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Have they tested it some back pockets? I remember last time apple made a thinest phone.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

Yeah, this feels like you could excellently snap it in half, with the camera bump for leverage and everything.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah there's absolutely no way this is the "most robust iPhone" like they claim.

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Who wanted this? People are on their phones for 36 hours a day and yet they're still trying to make them thinner?

I just hope they remember bendgate.

[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

JerryRigsEverything is going to love this.

[–] Robin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What is the point if the battery bump is the same thickness

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Are you trying to feed it through a pasta maker?

[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago

Yes, the pasta maker is 50% seat and 50% ass

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why not? Are you trying to dictate to me how to use my device?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I'll ask the questions around here?