this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
240 points (84.1% liked)

Political Memes

9473 readers
3789 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wars and proxy wars since 1776.

EDIT: The post is not an endorsement of the USSR. You can now stop fighting for your "team" and start defending the anti-war values you claim to uphold.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (19 children)

If you think the USSR wasn't, then you're not actually smarter for thinking that, you've just fallen for another country's propaganda.

[–] Damionsipher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The USSR was not communism. Even if you protest and hold ground that it was communist, it does not represent communism and was objectively separate from anarchism. You argument is akin to saying that the USA is democracy.

[–] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Communism is to the USSR is what freedom is the United States. If you squint a lot they kinda almost had it.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 week ago

They’re not wrong in this specific case though.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Da, unlike peaceful soviet socialists who only use peaceful tanks to bring unity, whether or not other nations know they need to be unified. Or Anarchists who merely seek to gently dismantle society and bring harmony to the world by cleansing all threats to that harmony.

The first half is fine, but the left side is some unhinged 1984 doublethink. "Our imperialism is the good kind. The other side is the bad imperialists."

[–] doomcanoe@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dunno, they are literally holding a gun to the back of the "Proud Liberal's" head.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

There's a moon spider on them. We just can't see because the image is from 1969.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What anarchists talk about cleansing? Are you referring to the dictatorship of the proletariat in Leninism?

You can't just make things up about an ideology and then argue like the thing you made up is true and well known. That makes you exactly like the meme you're making fun of.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lot of anarchists do seem to want a big purge. I’m not saying that’s inherently part of the ideology as a whole—I’m fairly sympathetic to anarchist ideals. But I’m not as sympathetic to terminally online weirdos who just want an outlet for their impotent rage. And a lot of such people do call themselves anarchists.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

I feel that difference exists for every ideology, though. Like a terminally online socialist or communist are also full of impotent, misguided rage.

Speaking from experience, when a terminally online inset -ist ideology here shows up for their first in person meeting, they usually require some amount of reframing.

[–] Damionsipher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Using violent tactics is not synonymous with war mongering. Maybe a definition helps to differentiate the difference "A warmonger is someone strongly pro-war. Warmongers favor war above all other options."

[–] flandish@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

where does anyone say “our imperialism is the good kind?”

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What's the purpose of that Soviet flag?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also who are these anarchists cleansing dissidents?

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Red Terror during the Spanish Civil War comes to mind.

No ideology is without its fanatics.

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks, I'll read up on it.

But from what I've read so far, the violence wasn't exclusively from anarchist groups and more of mass violence from all leftist groups during that time towards clerics and rightists?

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The violence wasn't exclusively from anarchist groups, but in anarchist-dominated areas, the anarchists committed the same kinds of violence that other leftists did.

This isn't to say that the anarchists were not the best of the lot, by far. Only that the notion that anarchists don't engage in unjustified mass violence against political enemies because of the sheer purity of their convictions doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I gotcha. I believe it. Have any book recs on the topic? Think this'll probably be the my next lil history read after I'm done 100 Years War on Palestine

edit: topic being spanish civil war period

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most of this is recollected from college. I can definitely recommend Orwell's Homage to Catalonia for a ground-eye view of the Spanish Civil War in general, though.

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cool cool, yeah i was reading on the wikipedia that he fought in the war. Will probably pick that up next. Thanks!

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stupid Americans. Fight wars like the like Britain, France, Spain, The Netherlands, Sweden, Portugal, Germany, Belgium, Italy. Good honest colonial powers who only ever fought on the good side of just wars and never created massacres.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why choose other imperialist powers as though this is a representative sample? Unless you're arguing that every country is equally bad--thereby excusing the US from its war crimes--its unclear what these examples are meant to prove.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The down voters need to take a closer look at what the USA was doing in all their wars

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The military industrial complex is pretty well known at this point. I suspect they agree with the message, but don't like that it's coming from someone further left than Democrats.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You can go further left than the Democrats without pandering for another warmongering, imperialist nation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

Dod sounded like a Dutch man saying death. Which is also funny.

load more comments
view more: next ›