this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
804 points (98.9% liked)

Political Memes

9429 readers
3334 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like the words "You will never say anything disparaging about Charlie Kirk" are hard-coded in his training set.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's, the pronoun is it's. It's not a person. Don't fucking give shitty ai humanity.

[–] Odo@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Its. No apostrophe unless you're abbreviating "it is".

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (6 children)

A dog has pronouns. So has a slave driver. So has a snail. They are not the sign of humanity.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Fake: video was edited Gay: someone shot his load on his neck

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 107 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Well, Grok is right about one thing: Charlie Kirk getting shot is a meme video. A NSFL meme video, but a meme video none the less.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 86 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The very last word out of his mouth was "violence". You couldn't dream of a more ironic twist. If it was fiction, the writers would be sacked for being too on the nose.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

If it was fiction, the writers would be sacked for being too on the nose.

Too on the neck.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And it was turning around the question about the number of mass shootings in the US to focus on gang violence

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago

And "gang violence" in that context is a racist dogwhistle.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

My dad has been saying that ck was never impolite, never insulting, never sarcastic, but tell me his last words weren’t sarcastic and racist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 93 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Is Grok ~~thinking~~ parsing that it's an AI video and not real? Why would grok ~~think~~ parse that.

[–] az04@lemmy.world 162 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

Because it's been trained on data from when Charlie Kirk was alive.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 77 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Grok has clearly been instructed to defend Charlie Kirk in every context and to assert he "wins" in any given situation. Right-wing people like Kirk and Musk are obsessed with image and not losing face. Grok, like Kirk was programmed to simulate the kind of rationalizations and vernacular that appeal to right-wingers, and so it tries to spin-doctor Kirk getting capped as "actually he's fine lol shut up nerd". I think it's hilarious, because it implies "Defend Charlie Kirk" is excruciatingly over-emphasized in the LLM's instruction set to compensate for the fact that Kirk actually got humiliated regularly.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And this is why you should never trust Grok, or any LLM for that matter, to be completely free from, well, just making shit up. This is because they do not think. They do not understand context. They are incapable of actual understanding. They are a next word guesser. Pure and simple. And when it has been trained to be bat shit crazy. Well you get bat shit crazy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 45 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Grok is an LLM and doesn't think at all.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine the world where this actually was a meme shot gone wrong. Maybe Kirk went a little nuts and decided to try to duplicate Trump's miracle near miss. The ultimate way to build credit among the right wing. Kirk hires a sharpshooter to give him a near miss, to just graze him with a bullet. And...well...the sharpshooter missed...

Now, I don't find this scenario particularly likely, as I don't think any of these right wing social media goobers are brave enough to actually put their person in such direct risk like that. And you have to be pretty fucking dense to hire someone to shoot a gun in your direction. But it is fun to imagine that wonderfully absurd scenario.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Naw, it was an assassination. Something only a government would want to pull off.

That leaves us with three likely candidates and a couple of unlikely.

If feel pretty strongly that because of the laser quick response this administration was aware beforehand.

The primary candidate would be the US. We all know that they love false flag operations and with the tide turning against this administration it needs a war or some major travesty to distract.

The second would be Israel. Their house of cards is about to fall and they have done similarly desperate terrorist acts like this before.

The third would be Russia the master shot caller who has been responsible for a lot of the far right movements we are familiar with.

I will admit your scenario is infinitely more entertaining and creative than what we are actually dealing with.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Naw, it was an assassination. Something only a government would want to pull off.

I would want to pull it off, as would many other leftists.

I see zero reason to think it was a state actor and not a decent person.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lets be real here and say that it was probably a right winger who had their brain scrambled

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You mean he might have Smollet himself? I like it.

There was that one YouTuber who was killed when he had his GF shoot a book he was holding for a stunt (thinking the book would stop the bullet).

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 40 points 1 day ago

The statistical word parrot is going to repeat what is statistically the most likely state of a famous person throughout its training data

[–] nuttycorn@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Because violence is banned from social media, it doesn't get to recognize it when it sees it.

This is so informative about how biased they can be.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Right wingers can post CP, gore, and make calls to commit murder and rape all they want on Twitter. Go look at what they're posting now about what they're going to do in retaliation.

It's everyone else who is getting ban hammered into submission for even contemplating fighting back.

For anyone who thinks that political violence is a two-way street in this country, just look at the difference between what one side is allowed to getaway with and the other isn't.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 20 points 1 day ago

Omg, the math shoggoth unable to change can't incorporate new information???

What a shock

[–] svc@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yep. Thanks Grok. Yes, it was fake. We all know it was fake. Simple fact. No need to investigate, procecute, argue or fight over it. He's well and will keep posting shit if he wants to, or he just retired by choice. Time will tell.

Nothing happened; carry on everyone!

[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Denial is part of greiving.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 25 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Holy crap that's awesome and scary. I'll never understand how so many take what these things say at face value. If only the public weren't so easily assuaged we could realize how dangerous this is.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Absolutely. It's like how everyone "knows" that you can't believe what you read in the papers, and will openly tell you as much, but then will still happily and uncritically believe anything they read as long as it fits into their existing worldview. Only now it's a hundred times worse, because the makers of this thing pretty much never get held accountable for the vast mountains of bullshit they're generating.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Like trying to argue with a real nazi. Seriously why are seemingly normal people even on that garbage platform?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] klemptor@startrek.website 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OK, it was is exact moment that I actually fully believed this is a simulation with the 'surreal' parameter maxed out.

[–] Snowcano@startrek.website 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I recently learned the term for this feeling is ‘derealization.’

And I too increasingly feel like I’m in someone’s game of The Sims and they’re just fucking with me more and more to see how insane things can get before I lose my mind.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

Dude do you know how hard I'd fucking laugh if he turned up like "Ahh what's up online, let's see... What? Shot? No me and the family were in The Poconos for the weekend, I'm fine!" And it was an AI deepfake the whole fucking time and now NOBODY CAN TRUST ANYTHING FOREVER lmao. Not that I like the guy but like, one day that'll happen, an AI deepfake of something will sweep the internet as "real" before being proven false and everyone who believed will be deeply unsettled, and here's the hopeful bit: maybe then we can convince a critical mass of people against AI.

But yeah if he did I'd laugh so hard my neck would just do that.

[–] quacky@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

That's hilarious

[–] don@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My man Grok settin’ the record straight for the ‘20s, and keepin’ it real af. He ain’t fooled by all that “Charlie Kirk took a round to the neck and suddenly became Old Faithful!” hoopty-jazz, so y’all can give up with that nonsense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tostos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 22 points 1 day ago

I think that's just squishy back-fat, folding over the back of the chair.

What looks really suspicious is his face - notice how his facial features are about twice the size that they appear normally, when you see them in memes.

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The guy behind him looks like the suspect.

load more comments
view more: next ›