Seems like the judge is appeasing Nazism here, and failing to protect the policeman and his family
Australia
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
Before you post:
If you're posting anything related to:
- The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
- Politics, post it to Australian Politics
- World News/Events, post it to World News
- A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
- When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Australian Politics
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
- Aussie Memes
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Moderation
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
I don't agree. The charge was against a threat to dox a public servant only. The judge can only apply the laws relevant to what the prosecution is chasing and here they are chasing a threat to a police officer rather than something more nefarious. There is also now clear precedent that future cases can point to during sentencing. If he had released the info, the case would be entirely different.
Police lawyers do not mess around and would have been advised on what they would be able to succeed with in court.
IMO it is important because the law should not BE APPLIED to people based on their beliefs. This does not mean to say the system is flawless, only that this application of the law is not an error.
You make a good point that law shouldn't be applied based off belief.
However, and I'm not saying this in regard to your point but as an independent sidenote, we must remember that Sewer isn't just someone who believes things, they lead a violent cult. They've been repeatedly convicted of affray and violent disorder among other things. Neo-Nazism isn't some abstract harmless idea, and given their context, these threats are not the same as if you or I performed them.
Meh, as if we want a Nazi in our community for 1 hour, let alone 200 hours.
Idk it sounds like a great way to treat the stupid little shit.
"Bad idiot! Go pick up garbage!"
He's still in jail awaiting sentencing for Camp Sovereign though right?