this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
45 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4489 readers
205 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wandering@aussie.zone 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Seems like the judge is appeasing Nazism here, and failing to protect the policeman and his family

[–] oneser@lemmy.zip 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't agree. The charge was against a threat to dox a public servant only. The judge can only apply the laws relevant to what the prosecution is chasing and here they are chasing a threat to a police officer rather than something more nefarious. There is also now clear precedent that future cases can point to during sentencing. If he had released the info, the case would be entirely different.

Police lawyers do not mess around and would have been advised on what they would be able to succeed with in court.

IMO it is important because the law should not BE APPLIED to people based on their beliefs. This does not mean to say the system is flawless, only that this application of the law is not an error.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 6 points 5 days ago

You make a good point that law shouldn't be applied based off belief.

However, and I'm not saying this in regard to your point but as an independent sidenote, we must remember that Sewer isn't just someone who believes things, they lead a violent cult. They've been repeatedly convicted of affray and violent disorder among other things. Neo-Nazism isn't some abstract harmless idea, and given their context, these threats are not the same as if you or I performed them.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Meh, as if we want a Nazi in our community for 1 hour, let alone 200 hours.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 4 days ago

Idk it sounds like a great way to treat the stupid little shit.

"Bad idiot! Go pick up garbage!"

[–] Rosencrantz23@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

He's still in jail awaiting sentencing for Camp Sovereign though right?