this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
82 points (96.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34544 readers
1148 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Fossil fuel subsidies. No longer needed since we have more viable alternatives, and they just contribute to global warming, and litter.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

Billionaires, government officials owning stock, private campaign finance, the two party system, racism, sexism, health insurance, private equity, for profit prisons, for life Supreme Court appointments, Nazis, Zionism, Wall Street, unregulated banking,jobs that don’t pay a living wage, unaffordable housing, student debt, the police state and lobbyists

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The belief that somehow through democracy and a constitution written by slave owners, somehow a country with half of the population being crazy, nationalistic nazis and the other half believing it's enough to live with these kind of people because of said democracy and constitution, that somehow society can go on and prosper just 'cause.

[–] el_twitto@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Donald Trump and the GOP

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Internal combustion engines.. We just don't need them anymore.

Their continued use really only measures up to hubris.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Stupidity and ignorance.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

Lithography.... That's the origin of phones, satellites, and rapid communication which apparently is something we as a species can't handle.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 6 hours ago

Most types of industrial scale pollution, but it's cheaper to bribe some key people than actually care about the environment

[–] Cameri@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 hours ago

Religion.

It served a purpose when societies were first moving from hunting and gathering to agriculture. A community needed to coalesce around something tangible for resource sharing, protection, decision making, etc...

It's why, from a societal evolution perspective, we went from totemic religions based on fertility and family groups, to mass religions with defined hierachies and roles, because the evolution or religions reflect that evolutions of society at the time.

We don't need that anymore. It does more harm than good in the modern world.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

English orthography. It's like this close to being random.

Other languages have reformed theirs (or theres or they'res) to make sense at some point since the dawn of modern literacy.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

fykst yt for ÿu

Inglyš orþografi. Ic laÿk dis klows tu biyņ random. Aðer laņgwajez hav riformd derz (or derz or derz) tu meÿk sens at sǎm poÿnt syns de don ov modern lyterasi.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Teräs Käsi.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

We did address it. And then everyone immediately changed how they pronounced every vowel.

We should address it again, and fix the way a ton of words have been Anglicized at the same time, but we're far from alone. French is loaded with needlessly silent letters as well, just as the first example that springs to mind.

(actually, can we just switch directly to the International Phonetic Alphabet?) (This is a bad idea for reasons that are probably obvious, it's a lateral move at best)

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Adopting IPA would be wrong because it would require that everyone talk exactly the same way.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

Speaking as someone whose native language uses phonetic writing, it simply makes sense. You just write what you say. Yes, some people talk differently, and because the writing is phonetic you can easily capture that in writing and you have multiple spellings for the same word in the dictionary (some marked as regionalisms). And as pronunciation of certain words shifts in time, so does the spelling. When more and more people start writing the word as it sounds, instead of the "correct" spelling, the new version gets added to the dictionary.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

We did address it. And then everyone immediately changed how they pronounced every vowel.

What do you mean? The Great Vowel Shift happened well before any standardisation of spelling I'm aware of. And there's plenty of problems beyond just the vowels.

French is probably number two on the shit list, but there's at least a consistent pattern there.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 11 points 13 hours ago

Well, facism seems like the obvious choice right now, but I'm going deeper and choosing bigotry.

load more comments
view more: next ›