this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
315 points (98.2% liked)

politics

25636 readers
3655 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

So, does laughing at the Kool Aid Fountain his neck turned into count? How about creating a playlist called In Memory of Charlie Kirk that starts with Hey Man, Nice Shot, and Bye Bye Bye?

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Unpopular opinion, most of your social media should be done anonymously with privacy tools.

But also not blaming these people for exposing their identity, and being against fascism.

[–] snackzilla@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where can someone learn about this? Specifically Facebook

[–] TeenieBopper@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure the answer here is "don't use Facebook."

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago

If you absolutely must use Facebook anonymously here's a Reddit comment that is more likely to work than using Tor/VPN for setup. However you'd also need to not friend anyone you know... Definitely curious what your use case is.

https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/eqzr0v/comment/fezxlrr/

I recently tried this. My finding was not to use all those anonymizing techniques. I tried them and had the exact same result as you. Then I tried the following: look as "normal" to the Facebook algorithms as possible. So, I found a cafe that used a regular residential style internet service provider, instead of some place like Starbucks or McDonald's which use commercial providers tailored for corporate use. Then I used an old smart phone I had and factory restored it on the cafe wifi. When installing and setting up Android I was able to get a gmail account much easier than getting one from my desktop PC - no request for phone number, etc. Then I made up a profile using fake info. I grabbed a photo online and modified it to remove any watermarks and changed it with a filter. I checked it against Tineye to make sure it wasn't available anywhere else. Then I downloaded the Facebook app on the phone and signed up for an account while connected to the cafe WiFi. You could use phone service provided internet, but I only registered for a non-data prepaid phone plan to save on cost. It was straight forward and I just verified the account through the phone (i.e. sms). The account was setup without any of the "warnings" and then I added a few details to the account (i.e. current location, hometown, education, etc.). I did a bit of searching for other users, nothing too extreme and then let the account age for a few days before using it regularly. I use it regularly now through a VPN and used it for an Instagram account as well. The key was looking as "normal" to Facebook as possible. I never use it from my home WiFi because I figure it'll just connect the two IP addresses somewhere in their databases. This was really just an experiment, more than anything. I don't use Facebook, but wanted an account for the odd time I needed to search Facebook for someone. My conclusion was that Facebook, Instagram, gmail, Snapchat, etc. are much more "lenient" when signing up for an account from a phone/Android then from a PC w/Windows/Linux/MacOS. Hope it helps.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Activists lol yeah activists for themselves.

[–] pozzy77@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Someone should setup a fake reporting site and then dig in on anyone that reports and send any political incorrect posts they said back to them and there Empolyer

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Right wing "activists"

Don't you mean "terrorists?"

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

How dare you call us violent?!? We'll kill you for that

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Feral maga is turning on itself and it’s pedo king. Soon they won’t have time to worry about us laughing because they’ll be busy trying not to get shot by their own guys

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 113 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"I'm so disgusted by political violence than I'm going to visit it upon everyone who celebrates it!"

We're clearly dealing with Nobel Prize winners here. /s

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (2 children)

These are the same Einsteins that voted for Taco just so he could be their "retribution" - meaning, visit political violence on everyone they don't like.

But yeah, they abhor political violence. 🙄

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

What they abhor is their chickens coming home to roost.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

"No, not like that! It was only supposed to happen to brown people!"

(And the gays, transsexuals, liberals, artists and other degenerate dissidents like that)

[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

So, just the Nazi playbook

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 days ago

Might as well add "people not far right enough" because that's who's getting targeted.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But celebrating political violence is what Charlie Kirk would've wanted.

At the every least he would have wanted is to have shown him and. His family he left behind zero empathy because empathy is a made up term.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hey, be careful now.

Every person in that pic would be more than happy to take a bunch of guns...

and give them to some sub-70 IQ inbred redneck with Christian psychosis to go fight their battles for them while they live in extreme luxury.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Musks shorthand version of this comic is especially telling.

“Let us torture you in peace or we’ll do it even harder.”

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Musk is correct, but they're not the ones not being left in peace.

[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Oh! My feelings!

Fucking cowards

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Let em. Do they want my address? I would love to kick the shit out of some dick less wonders.

[–] TeenieBopper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The amount of the population I fear in a fist fight is well less than 1%. These pussies bring guns tho.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is a really funny video of a proud boy showing up at someone's house to threaten them, but he's very timid and the guy just rips into him and he nopes off. But in reality, a coward with a gun an your address can be a real problem, not that I personally doubt your confidence, I'm also not scared of people knowing where I live, it takes two hours from the middle of nowhere to get to where I live, and it's one of the most hostile ecological areas on the planet, so. Come at me bro!

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Same. I'm not the tallest but I have been told I'm intimidating several times. I have boxed and I have been in actual fights. I would not call myself a Mike Tyson by any stretch of the imagination. But it's a very small percentage of the population that actually pipes up when I tell people to shut the fuck up. Which I have.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump is a pedophile and that’s what they’re protecting

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Charlie would be proud to shift the focus away from Trumps pedophilia.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"Allegedly"...

I haven't stopped celebrating for two days.

It wasn't RIGHT for him to be killed like that, but I believed the world would be better without him a week ago, and that opinion hasn't changed now that he's gone.

[–] Sammy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Every time I see his dumb (dead) face I'm like:

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But but but ...free speech

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Confederates: people that cry about so-called "cancel culture" and say they are "free speech absolutists" now are sending death threats to people that allegedly celebrated this.

Oh, and people have already lost their jobs over their reactions to Kirk...

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lying and hypocrisy are two of the main pillars of conservatism. Stop being surprised by it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't think anyone is the least bit surprised. But it should still be pointed out, not accepted as them being normal. Yes, it's normal for them, and of course they have zero shame about it. But it's not normal for most human beings.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 2 points 2 days ago

I certainly agree with this sentiment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure the Trump regime's FBI will be right on top of that.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

They gotta recruit from somewhere, right?

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So I'm looking up "Tyler Robinson" and Etsy has only MAGA. Nothing like the St Luigi which is what I want.

Normally I would use Grok to do a face swap but somehow I think that would get me a personal visit with Tulsi Gabbard that I do not want.

So I'm searching around and I find this: Replicas of Charlie Kirk shooting suspect Tyler Robinson's T-shirt On Sale

This shirt appears to have come from the Disabled Veterans National Foundation (DVNF), the Guardian reported.
One shirt on needshirt, for sale at $17.49, is described as a "funny political T-shirt."
One listing on Etsy showed a shirt with the description "Land of the Free Home of the Brave Shirt Bald Eagle USA Flag Tee Patriotic American T-shirt Charlie Kirk Shooters Shirt, Kirk Shooter Shirt."

Can anybody find a link to someone selling Tyler Robinson swag? Or get ballsy and sell some yourself?

EDIT: Found some on Ebay , they are selling like hotcakes

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The dude looks to be a groyper who shot the founder of TPUSA. So, basically a ~~Marklar~~ "maga" that shot another ~~Marklar~~ "maga".

I would think that the target demo for any associated gear would be very, very slim?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›