nymnympseudonym

Perplexity prompt: "quotes from openai about safety testing for gpt-oss"

Reply below:

Safety Testing Measures

• OpenAI’s safety process for open-weight release included technical audits (robustness, bias detection), structured adversarial testing, and evaluation of prompt-injection and jailbreak vulnerabilities.
• The organization also employed both automated and human review to test for outputs that could cause harm, leveraging cross-disciplinary teams including outside researchers, ethicists, and cybersecurity experts.
• Feedback from these rounds led to incremental model improvements before the open weights went public.

Transparency and External Collaboration

• OpenAI has collaborated with third-party security and ethics researchers to validate its safety protocols and stress-test new models prior to release.
• The company acknowledges that “Releasing open weights is a significant responsibility due to risks of misuse. We want to be transparent about our process and invite the AI community to help report and address issues that may arise post-release.”

maybe our averages are different

As a person who has been managing software development teams for 30+ years, I have an observation.
Invariably, some employees are "average". Not super geniuses, not workaholics, but people who (say) have been doing a good job with customer support. Generally they can code simple things and know the OS versions we support as a power user -- but not as well as a sysadmin.

I do find that if I tell them to use ChatGPT to help debug issues, they do almost as well as if a sysadmin or more experienced programmer had picked up the ticket. It gets better troubleshooting, they maybe fix an actual root cause bug in our product code.

Whatever it is, it's probably in the Epstein papers

No contest, no where to run