this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

news

95 readers
700 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The problem with her case is that Instagram likely has no contract under which it has agreed to host her account, and can thus change it's mind at anytime.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Esperanza Gómez

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Where did they get the idea that Meta needed any kind of justification to remove an account? That's ridiculous.

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's a court ruling. Courts usually get their ideas from applicable laws.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Typically, yeah, hence my confusion.

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'm not an expert on Colombian law, but I'd assume it's somewhere in there?