this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
98 points (97.1% liked)

World News

49793 readers
3141 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.is/q7vDC

The country now has more than 1,000 waste-incinerating power stations, representing more than half the world’s waste power capacity, according to the Global Waste-to-Energy Research and Technology Council.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago

Whatever happened to that plasma incinerator I heard about in Stuff You Should Know. It sounded so promising.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What great news, the trash is just gone once you burn it and nobody has to think about that statement any further. One thing real quick: we don't need clean air for anything, do we?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can be managed cleaner than landfill emitting methane into the air and other pollutants into soil and water systems

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can be

Unfortunately, this is not the same as "is being".

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you reckon China's management of landfill would be extremely competent and clean compared to their management of the incinerators

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you were to drop the "extremely" from the description, maybe but not necessarily. Let's see how the cancer statistics look for population centers downwind in a decade or so.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Expecting more or less than coal?

I don't know. Hard to make those predictions in the absence of good emissions data. I would expect cancer rates to be higher than in comparable areas that are not downwind of a trash burning facility though.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It is possible to burn waste and manage the pollution in at least somewhat safe manner. Finland and Sweden do it reasonably well with high temperature furnaces and filtering the exhaust gases either with mechanical filter or trough water. That also (at least as far as I know) requires that you sort out the waste and don't burn stuff like electronics, metals and some other crap which can be effectively recycled and manage whatever remains properly.

So, it's possible, but I have absolutely no idea if China does that properly.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are live pollution maps of the world if you need an idea if China does that properly but I‘ll have to warn you that you‘ll most likely be disappointed and somewhat terrified.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

I meant that I don't know if these trash incinerators are managed properly. I'm well aware that in general there's a crapload of unmanaged pollution and a ton of other problems around, but like every other country China is slowly improving their stuff so it's not impossible that new plants would be up to modern standards.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Finland and Sweden do it reasonably well with high temperature furnaces and filtering the exhaust gases ... with water

That's just a fancy bubbler (bong) 😂

Do not drink the forbidden bong water.

Some plants do, low bidders who get the government contracts don't have much of an incentive though.

[–] Bababasti@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh man, too bad most of our trash is digital now. The dumpster that is now called X would power the world for decades.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Where do you think Musk got his inspiration for his SuPErApP from?

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There’s plenty of waste in the world. They won’t help

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But would the energy recovered from using it as fuel be more than the energy required to ship it to China?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

The ships sending us Chinese goods have to return to China anyway. That’s why everyone was sending China their plastic to be “recycled”. Might as well just incinerate it.

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago

That’s a good question, but, would the waste then be properly disposed of? It may not be incredibly efficient right now, but less trash is less trash, right?