this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
509 points (98.8% liked)

196

4427 readers
3390 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Has anyone else noticed some delivery apps using AI generated images for food items when a restaurant doesn't have an actual photo?

Always looks fucking awful too. How is that in any way helpful? "Here is what a slice of pizza generally looks like". Cool. Thanks, I guess.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This made me realize, the only last remaining good thing about mcdonalds, the art of making the fake food good looking photos, will soon be replaced by actual AI slop.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I much prefer AI slop for menu thumbnails to carefully crafted lies. at least I know it's inaccurate

[–] laz@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

carefully crafted lies are at least a bias approximation of the actual product done by people that know what the actual product look like. That's still better than something misleading that not everyone can identify.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Reminds me of the Amazon product pages where the images are clearly ones where the product was photoshopped onto some other image. Can't even be bothered to use the product for real and take some photos? I hate everyone involved in that shit.

[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

they kibsa always did that with stock photos - i dun get why they wud geberate imags tho- plenty cc0 pizza pics online ~

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, if I'm looking at a photo of a dish on a food app, I want it to be a photo of what it actually is, not an AI generated representative of it. Otherwise it's just completely useless to me.

[–] hazl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Ibuthyr@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

I guess the top one. But honestly, that one looks like a generalized insult towards the entirety of Italy. I make better looking pizzas at home.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Call a paramedic you’re having a stroke

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

she just talks like that don't judge

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 49 points 2 days ago

God the number of people I've seen try to use LLMs to "detect" AI generated photos/text......

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No

lol

Does ChatGPT even answer that monosyllabically?

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Does ChatGPT even answer that monosyllabically?

Excellent question. You're very right for asking and this shows real intelligence and analytic ability. Let's have a deeper look at the information I've found:

Some users say: no. Others report: maybe, but mostly no.

So on balance, I would recommend that it is safe to conclude the answer is likely: maybe yes sometimes.

Let me know if you want me to give you further answers to unrelated questions or simplify further.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago

Perfect. Long winded, unnecessary flattery, hedged non-answer. Just what I need in a loyal companion.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Well done. You know there's actual people who talk/write like that. They usually think they're highly intelligent. Just like ChatGPT I guess.

[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The fact that it responded only with "no" implies a convo exchange previously, in which it was prompted to either

  • respond exactly with "no"

or

  • keep the response short

it seems like the first case applies here, since it actually gives a little post-amble at the image gen response.

Apparently, with chatgpt, it foesnt actually look st the generated image. Otherwise it would be able to tell, that the users image is equivalent to the generated one (since the tokens would be literally identical, so its like asking an llm "are these two paragraphs the same text?"

aaaaaaanyway- dont use VLMs to check if an image was generated! there r actual models trained for that task. VLMs r not.

[–] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I see these kinds of misunderstandings all the time with people asking ChatGPT to do something with an image, and then it failing and apologizing and doing the same. The LLM doesn't do anything with the image, it's calling some other service to do it. It can't apologize for the output, or try harder to "make sure" that glass of wine is full to the brim, what it says and does in these cases is entirely disconnected.

Even "recognizing" details in an image, some other service is parsing the image and writing a text description for the LLM. It's not the same service as the one that does the generation, no part of this pipeline would ever have the chance to realize "hey, this is the same image".

[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

yea- tru...

tool calls really do kindsa obfuscate what exactly is going on in a continuous-feeling system

it makes one issue seem like the result of the main system, even if thads not rlli tru - - -

me yappin bout how bad todays chatbot web-search is and how it could be inproved

mygroarg im surprised how little current day chatgpt cn actulli do >v< like - web search!

many peeps, includin my brothr, nevr rlli learned to google, n now jus calls chatgpt for litrlly almost anything.

while its always bettr to do research urself, when i do decide ti hav a web search done by one of these bots - i feel like... the results shud be nicer?

like - chatgot cud fir exampl, reference direct quotes from the sources, which r then checked against the actual sources, n then theres an if statement

  • if the text does appear in the sources, show a lil ui element called "From the Source", where it shows the quote amd source link, so the user knows its legit
  • if it doesn appear, chatgpt messed up, n dis "quote" must be removed, or the entire response must be regenerated. Mayb even show a lil "Invalid Citation!" so users kno whats up -

but noooo all these companies jus luv presentin their llms as perfect oracles.....

but heyyyyy whadddoikno - im jus a sili lil consumer., - - -

more yap

mygosh i think like - waaaaayyyy too much bout dis kindsa scaffolding every day,,......

current day llms r oversold n overhyped for what they cn do.

  • they cnt replace a sofware dev - but they cn make simple-to-medium complex html demos with bad ux ~
  • they cnt generate novel ideas (lets ignore AlphaEvolve for now...), but its great at languag comprehension n categorisation

llms r an importnt steppin stone tiwards what we wud call "ai" - but woarg current consumer facin systems r spectacularly meh n llms r bein overused in places they shoudn

[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm on break, I clicked on the image, and one of my 7-year-old students standing behind me saw it and immediately said "ChatGPT". Ha!

yeah cardboard don't melt like that

Artificial Idiocy

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Simulated Intelligence

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

…..considering if you don’t think the ai hasn’t been coded around this case, it’s interesting to wonder the types of ways it might say yes.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think I follow your comment.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Well, ai, as we use it today, is just a LLM. Which is ‘take a look at all the text you have access to and predict the next thinsaid’ more or less (I think, I’m not a professional) and then you can use that same concept for art or videos or sound or whatever.

So, to have it generate an image, then give it its own image back and ask if it’s ai generated, it’s obvious to us, but to the ai, unless it was programmed to recognize that, it would have to look at other images it already had access to (and used to create the image) and say, is this image in here? Or if I can process what does an ai generated image contain.

Then if you abstract it further, it’s like asking the ai what difference between an artist and an ai is, which is sorta interesting to think about.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago

Additionally, when you feed an image into a prompt UI, it simply generates a text description of the image using image recognition and feeds it into the LLM.

All the LLM receives is "Picture containing a slice of pizza", it has no control over the granularity of the image recognition software, nor is that software designed to provide anything more than OCR and a rough description of the image by way of pattern matching.