Interesting. If throw my tax returns in the garbage, and take the garbage can to the curb — there’s no expectation of privacy. The law says anyone can dig through the trash once it’s at the curb.
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
38 points (97.5% liked)
Privacy
3807 readers
542 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
I think the difference is, your phone is encrypted. In order to access any of the data, an attacker has to brute force your password (unless you left it powered on and it hasn't run out of battery yet), which means a clear security boundary that had to be broken.
Of course, banning circumvention is clearly bad in lots of other contexts (DMCA), but I think that a phone dropped in an emergency is a pretty good case. There's maybe even an argument than an unencrypted drive should be protected in that context, though I'm not sure it's my position.
Progress!