this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
618 points (95.2% liked)

politics

25739 readers
5301 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She’s embarked on a nationwide tour with Vermont’s Independent Senator Bernie Sanders, held town halls outside of her district in upstate New York, and raised $15 million

Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive who has cemented her popularity with young voters, is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028.

Ocasio-Cortez, 35, made a splash when she was elected to represent New York’s 14th congressional district, located in the Bronx and Queens, in 2019. Now, the Democrat is reportedly considering taking the next step in her political career as the party searches for its next generation of leaders, Axios reported Friday.

Members of Ocasio-Cortez’s team have recently been positioning the progressive lawmaker, known as AOC, to either run for president or run for a Senate seat.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Good! I hope she comes with some fire, sound policy ideas, and a tight campaign

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Title is a lie. It says right in the body "president or Senate". Downvote and report.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Also: "plotting"? What the fuck is this? Has running for president suddenly become illegal??

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

it's subconscious conservatism sneaking into the headline.

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 38 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

“Plotting” is an infuriating word choice.

I’d vote for her. I’m not interested in entertaining any arguments about electability. The least electable person in the universe has won the presidency twice. If enough people vote for her she is electable.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 5 hours ago

AOC concocts DEVIOUS scheme to repossess burger from McDonalds using PRIVATE bank account funding

[–] nuggie_ss 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

I'd vote for her in a heartbeat.

Probably one of the few candidates that have a chance with the democrats that would get me out to the polls.

If they nominate someone like kamala harris or joe biden again, it's all over.

This is of course assuming it's not all over already because they ran spineless crooks who don't represent the working class.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

At the moment, that will likely be Newsom unless something major happens.

[–] nuggie_ss 0 points 2 hours ago

Looks like I'll be sitting out another election.

Everyone getting mad at this needs to ignore me and direct any grievances they have towards anyone supporting newsom or another establishment candidate.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If they nominate someone like kamala harris or joe biden again, it's all over.

If they nominate someone like that, you should still go vote for that person and continue to fight for change, because the alternate is still far worse. The reality with US politics is that unless one of (or both) the two major parties implodes, the president will be affiliated with one of them. If one of the parties does break apart, it will guarantee a win for the other party.

If there is one thing the right does very well, it's to whip it's voters in line when election time comes. They may bitch and moan, but they'll vote for the (R) regardless.

[–] nuggie_ss 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You should be directing all of this energy towards those nominating candidates that don't represent the interests of the working class.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

sure thing, but you still need to vote for the less harmful candidate if your favourite doesn't get the nomination. You got Trump because people figured they'd protest and not vote or vote for Jill Stein or whatever. Republicans may have not been fully on board with a second Trump term, but they still voted for him. They will vote for whoever has the (R) by their name next time as well.

Does voting dem just kick the can down the road? Absolutely, but better than not having a can to kick..

[–] nuggie_ss -2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

sure thing

proceeds to do the exact opposite

Yeah, looking forward to staying home on election day. So fucking tired of the moderate white.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, looking forward to staying home on election day.

Have fun with another republican term then, because that is the only plausible result of not voting against them. That is, if there is another election since your morally superior not-voting got you Trump again and Project 2025 is by many accounts, well ahead of schedule. Good Job!

[–] nuggie_ss 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

You should be directing all of this energy towards those nominating candidates that don’t represent the interests of the working class.

God dammit. You people just don't learn.

We're both going to be stuck with a republican because you keep repeating the same mistakes.

Both of your comments were a complete waste of energy and did nothing to change my stance. You need to direct that energy towards the people voting for the hillary clintons and joe bidens over the bernie sanders and AOCs.

Now, are you going to waste more energy or finally learn and do something different? I know what I'll put my money on!

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Have the day you protest-voted for. Keep protest voting and losing. Keep letting your rights get eroded because your perfect candidate isn't on the ballot. But hey, if you protest vote enough, you might not have to vote anymore, the candidate that you allowed to take the white house said so.

[–] nuggie_ss 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's pointless trying to reason with people like you.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 0 points 57 minutes ago (3 children)

The feeling is mutual. Have fun in trump land, glad I'm not there.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 23 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028.

Stupid clickbait title.

[–] berno@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

She won't win a run for POTUS. Try Senate first.

[–] mikesizachrist@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

3rd time's the charm for seeing if the country will accept a woman. What's the worst that could happen?

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

She is one of only two people I would be excited to vote for.

The other person is Jon Stewart.

I want Dolly Parton.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sigh.

Look. I like her. I like her fighting spirit. I like that she gives a shit. I like it all.

But when is this country going to learn? Look around you. Our culture is trash. This country is overflowing with racists and sexists and incels. Look at where we are right now.

We've tried to elect a woman twice in a row. They were both WAY more qualified than their opponent. And they lost. I voted for both of them.

If we run AOC, they'll run a white male bigot. And they'll win. Again. Using the same tactics.

Know your audience.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I'm not sure the racists and sexists and incels are gonna vote for the Democrat candidate even if it was a literal clone of Donald Trump, solely because it's the Democratic candidate

[–] grooveygroovester@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think both oligarchs and corporatists alike will fight far too hard to take her down. The US would need a far more fair and democratic procedure to elect someone that would change the paradigm like AOC--especially since Citizens United.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

But why is there such this defeatist attitude any time someone remotely not terrible tries to do something? It’s like we’re doing the fascists work for them with talk like this. I get that fuckery happens any time someone kinda different or kinda maybe good (for a politician) steps up, but that can be overcome with more support. When the margins are thin, it’s easy for them to cheat. When they aren’t, it’s fucking not. So let’s stop making the margins tighter with this kind of talk

[–] nuggie_ss 2 points 7 hours ago

They want to be proven right when things go poorly, increasing the odds of that happening in the process.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, such dastardly plans.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Conspicuous in their, uh, inconspicuity

[–] Zink@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago

I'm picturing that family guy skin shade card, but the top says "decisive executive leadership" while the bottom says "plotting/conspiring."

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 12 points 22 hours ago

Whatever, I’ll wait for the official announcement. Love AOC but not getting my hopes up. Wait till there’s actual news.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 16 points 1 day ago

I was very disappointed no Tim Walz in that list of other potential candidates. He was the best part of the Harris / Walz ticket

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Yes please if only for her age. I want old people out of power and I mean that across the entire spectrum including Bernie sanders. He would be great in her cabinet but we need young people FFS

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

IF there is something to run in 2028.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I feel like shit typing this but I'm afraid America will not vote for a woman, each time it's resulted in disaster.

Sure I'll vote for her, but frankly we need a sure thing, we got a lot of mess to fix, starting with shoring up our constitution against bad faith actors and arresting and prosecuting fascist criminals.

Disbanding the heritage foundation, impeach and remove supreme court justices, reverse citizens United, and remove voting rights of all those pardoned for J6.

Fox news should be made an example of with laws preventing their type of misinformation and propaganda and they should be destroyed.

Scientific fact will be the rule and the standard. Education and our core of government will be free from all religion. Any church or religious organizations in politics will be taxed and disqualified from government.

So many people need to face consequences and I hope you all have a list and are keeping score.

The gloves are fucking off.

[–] canajac@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

You are delusional my friend.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Here's to hoping AOC is another Mamdani during the primaries.

load more comments
view more: next ›