this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
229 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25786 readers
2855 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump publicly vented at Attorney General Pam Bondi on Saturday, saying the lack of criminal charges against top adversaries was “killing our reputation and credibility.”

“We can’t delay any longer,” Trump posted on Truth Social in a message directed to “Pam.” “JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!” He specifically lamented the lack of criminal charges against Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, three of his most prominent political antagonists.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works 101 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It reeks of desperation. He knows he's running out of time. We need to keep the pressure up on every front.

I wonder how long before he fires Bondi. There aren't enough DOJ resources to chase every case he demands. And with virtually all of them being meritless, she has no hope of winning them. Sadly for Bondi, Trump hates losers. It makes me misty eyed to think of her future career 🎻

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It’s a minor miracle that the law even matters anymore. Are the courts not completely captured now? How?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 51 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

The US, for better or worse, really is a very distributed system. It's the only possible way that a single endeavor can grow to this size, you just can't have it all centrally managed and have anything at ground level still make any sense or get done well. It also has a pretty valuable property that a lot of the people operating it really believe in the mission of what they are doing. Prosecutors believe they're putting bad people away, grand juries believe they're making decisions about justice, National Guard people believe they're protecting the country. It's not always true (which carries its own variety of problem), but quite a lot of the time, it actually is (partly because it's kind of a self fulfilling prophecy as people are motivated to fix it at the local level if things go off the rails).

Trump doesn't understand any of that, which is why even medium-sized enterprises he's ever been involved with have always been a clusterfuck. And now he's driving the world's biggest robot, and surprise surprise, the controls aren't simple and it's not doing what he wants. We're just lucky that this decades-in-the-making fascist coup came to its climax with Angry Facebook Grandpa at the wheel instead of someone who knew what the fuck they were doing. Even Trump is having quite a bit of success with it. If it had been someone qualified, we'd have no chance at all I think.

[–] cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Exactly. Just wanted to say I found this insightful. A key part of historical American success is that every branch, department, and individual completes their role in the same true reality. They may differ in political opinion, but they all have the same facts.

Trump mucks it up by asserting a different, false reality every day. Nobody can guess for sure what it will be, except MAGA 🙄.

Honest people, regardless of poltics, will eventually find themselves an enemy of the clown.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

This is all backwards. Those are the things that allowed it to become this size; there’s nothing that says they have to stay because of its size, and the size could shrink to accommodate the new functioning (or lack thereof) of the courts.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

Those are the things that allowed it to become this size

100% true

This is all backwards.

Not sure where you got this part, since what you just said is precisely what I said

; there’s nothing that says they have to stay because of its size, and the size could shrink to accommodate the new functioning (or lack thereof) of the courts.

Also true

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago
[–] cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 days ago

It's true that the supreme court often bows to Trump, but the DOJ has lost frequently this year in the lower courts. Even there, traditionally the DOJ wins nearly all their cases. However, Bondi's DOJ has been so incompetent that they've lost a record number. So many, that DOJ attorneys are losing their deferential rapport with judges.

It's not perfect, and justice remains incomplete and slow, but the courts are jamming up the overreaches.

One great source of information and hope is Marc Elias's Democracy Docket series which frequently covers these topics.

[–] KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca 69 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Trump makes Nixon look like Abraham Lincoln.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It was pretty clear the cons weren't going to get any better once they topped Nixon just a few years later with Iran/Contra....and basically got off scott-free. They even had the fucking balls to lionize Ronnie Raygun who had the most criminal administration in HISTORY (up until that point, anyway) and try to put his fucking name and visage on everything and did everything possible to start re-writing history as soon as that geezer shuffled out of office.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

This - this fascism right here - this is why Fox News was founded by Nixon aides. To create this disgusting abomination and keep it wrapped up in the flag.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 4 days ago (2 children)

saying the lack of criminal charges against top adversaries was “killing our reputation and credibility.”

Yeah, i think he did that himself. POS.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Rule 1 of the kakistocracy: It's never the boss's fault. He has to be in charge of everything, he can't be questioned on anything, but it's never his fault when things go wrong.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Also rule 1 of being a narcissist.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

He’s already a credible and reputable fraud and rapist.

I mean, there are certifications. He’s secure in those.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Criminal charges? For what?

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

LOL, not under this so-called administration.

Remember when all these little Eichmanns had the fucking audacity to bitch about "lawfare"?

Projection, always projection.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

For not blowing smoke up the president's ass. You know the best president ever.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Insufficient toadying. Or whatever. He doesn’t care.

[–] Greenbird@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I wonder what all this litigation costs.