this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
128 points (95.1% liked)

politics

25875 readers
3693 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Senate Democratic leader said Trump's decision to accept a meeting shows Republicans "feel the heat."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Sunday that Congress can prevent a government shutdown when money expires this week, but only if Republicans engage in a “serious negotiation.”

In an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press,” Schumer told moderator Kristen Welker that he called Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., on Friday to encourage a meeting, which the White House accepted on Saturday evening.

Schumer said reaching a deal “depends on the Republicans.”

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He is making noises of placation. Truly the Chamberlain of our times...

Is that Mussolini next to Hitler in the top one? Well whoever they are they look like when your friend has to bring you lunch at work and look completely lost.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Who keeps voting for this clown?! His constituents keep disappointing me like Ted Cruz's.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago

Just resign already for fuck sake

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 105 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You cannot have a serious negotiation with people who aren't serious.

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 62 points 3 days ago

I think they’re bad-faith actors rather than unserious. I’m afraid they’re deadly serious.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Schumer is a traitor. You do NOT negotiate with terrorists. You make demands, if they don’t comply, you shut it down.

Shut it down, Schumer. Shut it all down. Call for a general strike and don’t capitulate until all demands are met. This is your move to fuck up, and we will not forget if you do.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Lol the day Schumer calls for a general strike I’ll donate all my existing money to his campaign.

Read: never

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 74 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We NEED a Serious Negotiation! And if we DONT get it we'll SIGN their Budget ANYWAYS!

-Chuck Schumer!

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

As long as Americans are loyal to Israel, he's doing his job according to him... So I guess even he thinks he's a failure.

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 days ago

He Chuck... try this line on for size: We don't negotiate with terrorists.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

There goes my healthcare

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

How many times do the Democrats need to steal defeat out of the jaws of victory for it to form a clear composite image of collaboration?

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 31 points 3 days ago

Sure. But a serious negotiation doesn't involve giving up civil rights or empowering the path to fascism. Somehow I don't think Chuck shares my opinion there

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

And here we go, once again into the breach of defeat and capitulation.

Absolutely spinless and worthless Democratic leadership fit for nothing.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Real democrats don't negotiate with Nazis.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

I mean... *gestures broadly at everything*

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

Shut up old man, get out of the way!!!

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

A serious negotiation with people who want to destroy the country.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

Primary this fucking fossil. Assuming there’s another election.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If he caves the Dems need to call to replace him. Absolutely failed as a leader here.

I agree, but that's just not the way Dems work.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Please retire.

Priming us for when he sells us out... Again.

We need Schumer to be primaried

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's already completely broken Schumer. It's a rotted carcass. And we all played a roll in that whether we knew it or not.

[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Shut it down. There won't be any actual negotiation.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

They get either nothing or one token concession that doesn't really matter and then cave, and pat themselves on the back for the great win.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Democrats would brag if they got a rapist to wear a condom. They'd call it a bipartisan nut while we actively bleed to death in an alley.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It's how to maintain the illusion of an opposition party without meaningfully opposing fascism

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

Don’t negotiate with arsonists! They want to burn it all down. Be a wall of water!

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

We've tried making our voices heard with the first amendment, maybe the 2nd amendment should be tried?

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd prefer to listen to Schumer after he's in the ground. 🤢

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Fair, but let's try anyway? We can always forget to listen after it's begun...