219
1080p Universe (programming.dev)
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mac@programming.dev 119 points 11 months ago

Triggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Ludicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you're fooling us, but I'm not having NONE of it.

[-] SnuggleSnail@ani.social 44 points 11 months ago

The reason is that we don’t need more. 1080p is what you can observe on a fullHD screen, so there is no need for more.

[-] DudeDudenson 11 points 11 months ago

The eye can't see past 1080p, clearly

[-] odium@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

4k is a marketing scheme

[-] ALERT@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 months ago

1080p is enough for everyone

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.de 9 points 11 months ago

Google is getting better and better!!

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago

Well have you counted them?

I don't seem to have any particles around here I do have an awful lot of stuff but no particles.

[-] Deebster@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

I started counting, but my 10-bit counter maxed out. My answer was quite close to Google's though 👍

[-] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Bad news for foxes.

[-] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago
[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

A disturbing number of people trust this little and even cite it "according to google"

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
219 points (99.5% liked)

Software Gore

7 readers
1 users here now

A community for posting software malfunctions

Deliberately bad software or bad design is not software gore, it must be something unintentional

Icon base by Delapouite under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient and shear it



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS