this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
29 points (96.8% liked)

privacy

6601 readers
51 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm tired of collecting phones, and frankly I'm a little money strapped and kind of want to coast by on older phones for a while. But I'm wanting to de-google as much as possible.

Of the last few phones I've had, all are working well. Most have been able to be kept relatively up to date with LineageOS, and a couple have /e/os/ versions available for them (one official, one community)

  • Essential Phone (Community Build e/os/...not sure if still being updated or not though.)

  • Moto One Hyper (No e/os/ build. Sadly not a popular enough phone)

  • Moto One 5G Ace (Has an e/os/ build. Currently being used as a DIY game emulator on LineageOS)

  • Motorola Edge 2023 (Current Phone. No e/os/ build. It's essentially a canadian variant of the Motorola Edge 40 Neo...which are the only two newest phones to use the Dimensity 7030 chip, making it incompatible with the regular Edge 40 or 40 Pro e/os/ builds.

I'm using /e/os/ on my Essential phone (though not daily driver) to get a feel for the software and the Murena app/account. I'm willing to give up my game emulator to put it on the newer phone if I like it (though it would suck to lose my FFVII and Chrono Trigger playthroughs)

Ideally my Edge 2023 would have a build. But I'm not going to expect a chipset used by only two phones total to garner that much development focus (and rightly so)

Anyone have more long term experience with /e/os/ and Graphene and tell me what Graphene has stronger?

Thanks

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RelativityRanger@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Well, yes and no.

/e/ is more de-Googled than LineageOS, and it also replaces some GApps with its own ecosystem (whereas LineageOS just gets rid of them). I would say that this makes it slightly more private.

However, /e/ also takes a lot longer to apply updates from upstream Android. LineageOS and GrapheneOS both take a few days up to a few weeks to do this; whereas /e/ sometimes takes months.

In the past, I would have recommended DivestOS and Calyx OS, but sadly DivestOS is unmaintained and Calyx OS have temporarily stopped releasing or updating their OS.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

How is /e/ more de-googled than an OS with zero Google services?

I thought /e/ shipped with MicroG, while I know Lineage doesn't - you have to add it if you want it (I'm running Lineage).

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

LineageOS still uses Google for things like captive portal detection and DNS (at least, out-of-the-box). /e/ replaces these with their own services.

[–] pasdechance@jlai.lu 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Hi. I too have found myself asking questions like this when I had phones that had custom ROMs.

tell me what Graphene has stronger?

When I looked into this, I found that Graphene is hardened and is more secure while other ROMs spec into the privacy aspect only.

I still keep my list even though my current device/chipset is not supported by these ROMs.

Alternative/Custom ROMS

In no particular order, these ROMs usually change the UX/UI and maybe add some security enhancements.

Privacy|Hardened ROMS

Security-wise, LineageOS is a start but (correct me if I am wrong) you need to unlock the bootloader, which is not great. These ROMs purport heightened privacy or "hardened" security.

  • iodéOS: "deGoogled" LineageOS fork, uses lots of blacklists for ad- and tracker-blocking. Sells pre-installed devices.

  • /e/OS: A "deGoogled" Android experience. Uses microG, no telemetry sent to Google, modified NTP and DNS servers, modified GPS service. Uses the "App Lounge" which combines the Aurora Store with F-Droid and PWAs. Has a tracker blocker. Requires you to have an @murena.io account for some functionalities.

  • GrapheneOS: Private, secure, hardened... has a long list of features. Updates are fast, exploitations are quickly mitigated, non-profit. But, Pixel-only.

  • CalyxOS: PAUSED

  • ~~DivestOS~~

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 2 points 21 hours ago

IMO best bet is to wait 2-3 months for Calyx to resume

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Absolutely not.

Back when DivestOS was operational, they maintained a database of bugs, flaws, and security holes that the E Foundation and Murena refused to patch.

  • MicroG isn't a secure front-end, it still phones home to Google.
  • Their native IP scrambler is just an old fork of TOR
  • Their webview (the core of every phone's ability to run a web application from Lemmy to Fruit Ninja) doesn't have hardened measures to prevent interference.
  • The bootloader stays unlocked. This means that the most essential feature for your safety, the metaphorical lock on the front door of your house, is left broken and loose.

Hell no, do not use /e/os. Use Lineage. Use Grapheme. Use Linux Mobile. Use literally anything else.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The bootloader stays unlocked. This means that the most essential feature for your safety, the metaphorical lock on the front door of your house, is left broken and loose.

Your information is out of date. For example, the Fairphone's bootloader can be relocked and you can buy Fairphones with eOS pre-installed (and of course locked).

To find more phones that support relocking with eOS, filter this list by "verified boot".

[–] monnier@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Can someone point me at technical info about the risks of having an unlocked bootloader? From where I stand, the risks seem completely irrelevant (to take advantage of an unlocked bootloader, the attacker would need to have full access to your OS already). AFAIK, locking of bootloaders was never designed to protect the user, but only to let cell-phone providers restrict what phone users can do.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago

Damn, go look up PostmarketOS on the Graphene forums. Really disappointing.

Despite Graphene's clear limits, they claim to have a backup plan, and I like the way they communixate clearly.