Pam Bondi is protecting paedophiles. You can also check some MAGA influencers to back that up too...
Lock HER up!
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
477 points (98.4% liked)
politics
26125 readers
3002 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
One of the many reasons they won't allow a 28 election, if and when sensibility returns to office, she'll easily be prosecuted.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
There was a dream that was the United States of America. A dream that any man, that anyone, could seek out their fortune and happiness. Being free to succeed, free to fail. But free above all else to seek happiness and liberty. This dream has never really been realised, but there was always hope that one day it could be. That The United States of America could be a place of hope, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness for all. That hope, that most fragile of things, is under attack. A dark cloud of control and censorship that seeks to stamp out that hope of freedom. If there was ever a line, it has surely been crossed now that theres masked men lifting people off the streets for the crime of "looking brown". At some point this has to stop being a battle in ones and zeroes, and needs to be taken to the very streets of those who would take away freedom and hope of the masses for their own gain. At some point, the line has to be drawn that the will of the people will not tolerate it being broken.
There are many tools to challenge tyranny in The United States of America. Legal, and otherwise. And it is, or should be, the duty of every citizen to use those tools to protect liberty, freedom, happiness and most of all, hope. To paraphrase the famous words of Jean Luc Picard,
"I will not sacrifice these United States. We've made too many compromises already; too many retreats. They invade our space and we fall back. They kidnap people in broad daylight under the guise of law, and we fall back. Not again. The line must be drawn here! This far, no further! And I will make them pay for what they've done!".
Yet they are ignoring the hundreds of murders by right wing fascists over the years since it doesn't fit their agenda.
This administration is so embarrassing. I can't wait to see them in prison.
So the Homeland security boss wants us to take cues from, checks notes Youtubers and TikTokers who checks again have been paid and sponsored by the government or Russia, am I right?
OK. I'll check with Youtubers. Mo1stCritikal will be my first.
OK. I’ll check with Youtubers. Mo1stCritikal will be my first.
Huh, turns out he has an anti-firebombing stance. That's almost as bad as being antifa so he's a terrorist
Attorney General Pam Bondi asserted Antifa was “no different” from the MS-13 drugs gang, citing the experiences of MAGA ~~influencers~~ propagandists to support her claims
There. Fixed that for you.
I am antifa...
Every decent human being is.
Oh sure, let me just check with Charlie Ki- oh wait
Projection!
MAGAts are domestic terrorists destroying rule of law & our Conststution
Pam bondi is a slut
Wonder why you decided to make a sexualized accusation against her.
Well, she does whore herself out to the MAGAt-in-chief.
Uh huh. Because attractive women you don't like must be whores and get their positions with sexual favors.
Yes, we just went over this, but I guess it's nice that y'all keep warning women to stay away from Lemmy.
Because attractive women you don’t like must be whores and get their positions with sexual favors.
Bold of you to assume whoring out implies merely sexual favors. I was actually saying she is whoring out her character and reputation in exchange for power and money; you know, like one of those metaphor things we learn about in middle school.
Go ask the other fascists who've been called mean names if these people are terrorists lol
Obvious distraction with no supporting evidence is obvious
Publish the jobs report
Publish the Epstein data and arrest the pedophiles who raped those kids
Stop untrained, violent federal agents from hiding their identity and deporting kids with stage 4 cancer
It is a distraction, but it's also pretty obviously an attempt at narrative control.
We know what happens to people who get accused by this administration of being a gang member regardless of any evidence. It becomes an excuse to ignore basic rights.
We know that new memo NSPM-7 relies on vague language and Patriot Act era justifications that could potentially allow them to label any opposition to the president or the GOP as a member of Antifa, and it labels members of "Antifa" domestic terrorists. Under the patriot act, people who are believed to be domestic terrorists lose automatic rights and protections of civil liberties, in the name of keeping America safe from terroristic threats. Loss of individual rights for the greater common good.
The GOP has made very public statements about the No Kings rally and accusations about Antifa/paid protestors. Aside from just attempting to send a message to their base and stir up (potentially violent) conflict against a peaceful protest, it also provides the narrative that everyone attending the protest knew that doing so risked associating them with domestic terrorism.
I feel like it's pretty obvious where this is going. Or at least what they're threatening and want us to believe it's going. I'm not sure that they will actually follow through with cracking down, but there seems to be a few different possible scenarios for why they are so desperate to repeat and spread this rhetoric.
A. They are using this tactic to scare and intimidate people in order to decrease turn out on Saturday.
B. They actually will crack down on the protest, and use it as an excuse to target and arrest people for expressing free speech.
C. They're hoping their supporters will hear their rhetoric as justification, and carry out their dirty work for them by commiting an act of domestic terrorism. Except since it was an act against Antifa, obviously they will be considered patriots, not terrorists.
If C. happens, it not only keeps their hands clean, it potentially allows them to deploy military or federal safety task forces across the country to crack down and "keep the peace, for everyone's safety" even though their rhetoric definitely seems to be encouraging something like this to happen.
If B. happens, and arrests and agitation of peaceful protesters causes enough chaos and outrage, it also potentially gives them an excuse to deploy more military or federal task forces to cities across the country to prevent riots. (Which they're probably going to be doing in the very near future anyway, this just gives them the illusion of justification despite instigating the chaos.)
I'm hoping for the best case scenario, which is obviously A. They're just using fear tactics to passive aggressively suppress free speech. TACO but they're also willing to stoop lower than low to advance their agenda.
Regardless of what happens, the labeling anyone who disagrees with you "Antifa" is fascist bullshit, and if people stay home on Saturday, the actual terrorists win.
The only way they could work harder to convince us they're fascists is if Politicians got caught with an American Flag grafted into a swastika and an accompanying pro-hitler text message controversy.
This coming civil war is going to be wild.
I know it sounds callous, but I'll have the popcorn ready anyway
And I label the current administration as nothing different from the Nazi era.
And I'm closer to the truth than this "lady".
I don't need to. I can look at the last mass shooter and I know who the real threat is.
Fascists really don't like people who fight fascists.
I'm right here, Pam. I'm antifa. Come at me.
If you’re not antifa, then you’re fa.
She accused Antifa of being responsible for the “chaos” in Portland and other cities
They’re no different than MS-13 or any gang out there.
So MS-13 would have won against Nazi Germany in WW2?
Don't you remember MS-13 riding around naked on bicycles and dressing up as frogs??
Hello, I’m an antifa domestic terrorist and I’m in opposition to this regime. My username here is also my legal name.
Come on, Pam, come fuck up a stroke-addled disabled trans woman who doesn’t have the strength to lift a gun!
Cassian Andor: Well, we'll find a place they haven't ruined yet. Maarva Andor: I'm already there. That place is in my head. They can build as many barracks as they like, they'll never find me.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
1930s: Jews, Poles, communists, trade unionists, homosexuals, the mentally ill
2020s: Antifa, immigrants, leftists, LGBTQ, the disabled
I'm so close to getting a BINGO with that last list!
It's never too late to become an alcoholic!
Who is Antifa murdering these days? Human trafficking? Drugs? Bombings? wtf is this govt even talking about?
No no no, you call anyone that does something you don’t like antifa so you can pre-arrest other antifa before they commit a crime, thus preventing crime. This is an innovative strategy that certainly isn’t illegal at all
load more comments
(2 replies)
All this over inflatable costumes and naked bikers? I mean…. Tell me you’re worried without telling me you’re worried. 🙄
view more: next ›