Linux

It feels pretty fucking ironic when my old macbook/laptop supports new OS versions for a decade, but my few years old high-end gaming PC? Outdated for Win11.

It's basically a linux distro that's meant to appeal to Windows users who want to keep the Windows look and feel.

In other words, blasphemy in this church.

Genuine question: Why not mint? Whats wrong with it and why is kubuntu much better?

Is ZorinOS niche? It's Ubuntu with a Windows ricing.

Zorin and Mint are frequently recommended foe Windows users. With Zorin having paid support for schools etcetera.

Zorin is a bit more commercial but it looks good and not much can go wrong.

Zorin has laudable aims but it's delivered in a flawed way. It's essentially Gnome with extensions to make it look and feel like other GUIs. Problem is, Gnome is not a good base for this type of approach - it is fundamentally not flexible and not designed for this. So Zorin is basically deliberating breaking Gnome to make it into something it's just not meant to be under the hood.

Zorin looks very nice graphically and seems good at at first but then niggles come along. Minor but constantly present.

I think it's probably OK for a Linux newbie but not ideal long term and doesn't have the user base to make it as easy to get support as Mint for example.

If you do want to mimick other GUIs then really don't start with Gnome. You can achieve much better results using KDE on any distro; KDE by design is flexible and it doesnt require breaking fundamental design decisions made for Gnome to mimick something else. Only downside to do-it-yourself with KDE is if you do want to perfectly mimick another GUI then it is a manual process of finding themes and skins that match the aesthetic you want.

That's becuase Linux is it's own thing and not focused on trying to mimick other DEs (even if some GUis have superifical similarities to Windows or MacOS).

I get what Zorin is trying to do, but I think using Gnome is a mistake but also for me the basic idea of "familiar to ease you in" doesn't really work. Better for people to learn how Linux is different - there is a choice in design philosophies but all of them are shaped around what Linux is and how it works rather than what Windows or MacOS are.

The fact that they default to Brave Browser already makes me wary. I have plenty of issues with Mozilla myself, especially their recent trend of integrating AI into the browser but I would rather use a fork or even vanilla Chromium rather than Brave. I know it's just the default and you can switch easily but the fact they landed on THAT out of all available options doesn't give me confidence, I would go with Mint instead.

Its a good lazy out of box distro which is why I use it. I don't have to tweak or install much to get work done once installed. Most additions I have made are for some nice quality of life or just a niche thing (sending text to a network port for a virtual machine. oh and the virtual machine software). I complained that they should use kde and finally installed it myself but again I don't have to configure or add anything after installation to be using it for most things I do so I can hit the ground running. Again. Lazy.