this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
614 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

76258 readers
3061 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not surprising, the card was filled with... UNCOMPRESSIBLE DATA!

[–] caveman8000@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 42 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They should have built the hull out of SanDisk cards.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago

I'd go for a mix of 50% sd cards and 50% controllers. Maybe 40/60, science is not decided yet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 73 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

Tragic?

Try "predictable"

Please watch the Netflix documentary if you havent.

The sub was never meant for that depth and they knew it.

They could literally hear the carbon fibers snapping every dive.

They had to retire an entire chassis because it failed at similar depths.

Nahh, the tragedy is rich people think they are better than physics itself.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The tragedy is that more of these rich people don't test that belief against reality.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At least two billionaires keep firing rockets into space as a hobby. It's only a matter of time.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

But they put other people on those rockets, not themselves.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago

Appeal to their vanity. Start saying how brave the astronauts are and make them celebrities. Give them all the credit. Don't mention the funders at all.

Next ones go up with a billionaire on board for sure.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This was a reverse tragedy.

There was a tragedy. One billionaire forcing their child to die

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Spoiler: Nothing about the big boom or that trip was on it (as designed, lol), but it's cool that it survived.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Damn, that’s promotional material that SanDisk would probably not want to have.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why? It wasn't there submersible, their product wasn't responsible for its destruction and frankly there is very little in the way of public sympathy.

The product is not even rated as waterproof and yet it's survived months at the bottom of the ocean after having survived a destructive implosion.

That's hella marketing.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The marketing is more for the submersible camera that survived, just like it was designed to do, the SD card was just inside the camera and no water even touched it. I don't think the SD card should be getting any credit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why not? If anything, it shows how durable their product is. If it were my company, I would market the shit out of this.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

It shows how durable their product is… when stored in an enclosure designed to protect it. The SD card probably didn’t even experience an increase in air pressure.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What do you mean "tragic"?

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Well, that kid didn't ask to be there, so that's pretty tragic.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A tragedy is an event of great loss, usually of human life. Such an event is said to be tragic. Traditionally, the event would require "some element of moral failure, some flaw in character, or some extraordinary combination of elements" to be tragic.

To me this is tragic even in the Greek sense

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buffaloupperclass@sh.itjust.works 245 points 3 days ago (5 children)

It originally was an SSD drive

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 175 points 3 days ago (2 children)

These compression methods are getting out of hand

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 143 points 3 days ago

"Somewhat disappointingly, the images and videos shared in the report were taken in the vicinity of the ROV shop at the Marine Institute"

There, saved you a long read

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

That even a depth rated camera is broken can easily explained with the point that the implosion produced shock waves with pressure spikes easily exceeding the official ratings of the camera.

[–] AbsoluteAggressor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Gotta love that SD technology. Now if only we could build a sub with it.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Just make the next sub out of SD cards, Nokia 3310 phones, piloted with a Logitech controller.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 37 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I would never have gone in a submarine called the Tragic anything.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 101 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

"and you can buy that exact SD card model for the low, low price of $62.99 on Amazon RIGHT. NOW!!!"

That might not be the weirdest, most awkward product placement I ever saw, but close.

EDIT : for those not seeing it, yeah, the article actually mentions that price and has a direct link to Amazon.

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

“I don’t travel on potentially doomed subs without these 10 things from amazon, you won’t believe how cheap number 1 is!!”

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

tbf, finding your product still working after the implosion is already amazing publicity

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 26 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The SD card was from inside a titanium cased underwater camera that was mounted outside the hull. It wasn't actually in the implosion, it just survived the shockwave (which was probably 1000s of Gs, so still impressive)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Skysurfer@slrpnk.net 130 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately it only had older still photos and videos, nothing from the last dive. Looks like they had the camera configured to send the data to the onboard computers and those were smashed into a soild mass, of which, no data was able to be recovered from.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 87 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Tragic? What was tragic about it? It were just some insanely rich doing something insanely stupid: dive in an untested home made tube built from rejected discarded build materials to dive to insane depths to disrupt a protected monument of something which killed thousands.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 109 points 3 days ago (8 children)

The kid that was killed didn’t want to be there. He was terrified. He only went because rich daddy insisted & paid for him to come along. That’s tragic.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] d3lta19@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 days ago (19 children)

Kinda seems like it was the right call if it survived an implosion

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Scott Manley has a one hour video going over all of this, including the ridiculous redaction of ~~James Cameron~~ providing expert testimony by first saying he directed The Abyss

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

James Cameron is genuinely a world expert on submersibles. He made The Abyss and Titanic because he loves the deep sea

He made Titanic solely as an excuse to go down to the Titanic and film the wreck. He didn't even have an idea for the story when he pitched the movie

Then he became the first person to ever design and dive his own submersible to Chellenger Deep, and only the second ever submersible to reach that depth (after the US Navy's Trieste)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

lol he first said he directed Titanic.

The actual interview: https://media.defense.gov/2025/Sep/17/2003800984/-1/-1/0/CG-115_INTERVIEW-DEEP-SEA-EXPLORER_REDACTED.PDF

You don’t have to get very far to realize who it is.

load more comments
view more: next ›