this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
80 points (94.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

37788 readers
1509 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just finished watching a couple of the Bourne movies and I always enjoy a good fantasy break from reality once in a while. But as I watched it again, I began to notice more and more plot holes to everything and it became a game to me as I watched and noticed how in so many instances, Jason Bourne just wanders around in public with no masks or facial changes, yet in the background, they keep showing these sophisticated control stations by the CIA/FBI/Secret agencies that can monitor and scan literally anything and everything all at once. I know its movie magic but the film at one extreme leads us to believe that they can monitor everything ... yet on the other hand, their key suspect is able to just wander around in public without anyone seeing him.

So I thought to myself how it would be hilarious if someone digitally remastered one of the Bourne movies and turned every single character and person that appears into Jason Bourne ... even the women, black guys, Middle Eastern people, Asians, big fat people, children, old ladies ... main characters, officers, government officials, the president of the United States, waiters, agents, soldiers, background people ... make them all Jason Bourne.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xkbx@startrek.website 29 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Jesus Christ, it’s Jason Bourne

[–] siha@feddit.uk 3 points 7 hours ago

Bourne, Bourne Again Shell

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This is literally how people with some types of facial aphasia see other people

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They see everyone as Matt Damon?

[–] Strobelt@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Only the ones Borne with it

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Gary? hahaha Gary! Gaaaaary

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

If you liked that, have you seen Enemy of the State? That one may deserve a modern take, been almost 30 years. (Ouch!)

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 15 points 12 hours ago

Oops! All Jason Bourne!

[–] radix@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

While they're at it, let's include image stabilization. Shaky cam was the worst film fad of the era.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not just shaky cam, the sequences straight up don't necessarily make cohesive physical sense. Like they show hits and moves in orders that don't properly flow into each other

I find it funny that one of the director's latest movies is the Road House remake, where they used a new technique that lets them show every impact in incredible clarity. Feels like he really took the shaky cam criticism to heart.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yeah, yeah it is. It's got Conor McGregor in there as a villain, so you have to be ok with that, but if you are, it's honestly just a lot of fun. There's an unhingedness to it all that really tickles me in the right spot.

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, the movies have a TON of plot holes in them. But if you enjoy reading, the original trilogy is amazing. Half the reason those plot holes exist is they removed Carlos. He's the bad guy and the entire reason everything is happening.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, iirc first book is basically the length of the first three movies and entirely revolves around Carlos. I loved it when I read it in high school.

The movies were also pretty great, but i think I always expected that as I grew up I would understand the action sequences more, and it turns out that no, the action sequences are just nonsense and don't actually make sense.

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Yea, but I'm pretty sure that's exactly what they were trying to make. Good action fighting scenes held loosely together by low effort excuses disguised as plot. And based on how much money the movies made, it's hard to blame them for their decisions.

[–] stonkage@aussie.zone 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Also he never seems to get held up by flight delays, traffic or trips to the toilet because of a dodgy takeaway.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Safe deposit box with passports, cash, and a bottle of Pepto.

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No one needs to hear this but I unironically prefer The Bourne Legacy.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Loved the movie but it had one of the biggest plot holes of them all .... how they could manufacture an international American passport with a razor and a photo in a hotel room and get by electronically controlled immigration systems to fly to the Philippines like it's still 1945

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 5 points 10 hours ago

Funny I don't remember that. Time for a rewatch! The film is ridiculous like all of them are, maybe even more so. Think about the whole drone scene at the start with the high powered rifle, the wolf, the tracking device etc. But of the four films it's the only one I go back to.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Jason Bourne Again

[–] jstin86457@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I'd love to see this for The Truman Show.

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

That would get me to watch them, I would watch TF out of "Bourne: Multiply The Fun"! I gave up after the 2nd film and the 50th cryptic dialogue about Treadstone, I realized I didn't care any more what whoever did to turn him into a SuuperSekritAgent. WTF was it that made Bourne 3 to Infinity so dull? Skilled supporting actors, exotic locations, a semblance of a plot arc...