179
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] teft@startrek.website 79 points 11 months ago

"The claim was that she pulled seven grams of cocaine laced in fentanyl out of his pocket and a gun, so that’s what they charged him with," Maxwell said. "Once the video came out, all of a sudden, those charges get dismissed because the video clearly doesn’t show her pulling any drugs out of his pants."

ACAB

This is why no one trust these fuck stains. I don’t understand how cop testimony continues to be held up like a bastion of truth when we have numerous examples of them pulling shit like this just because someone had the gall to question their authority or injure their ego.

[-] DABDA@lemmy.world 49 points 11 months ago

It's insane that "Brady lists" are considered the better remedy than just removing the offending officers from police work entirely (as well as charging them with some kind of perversion of duty).

Police officers who have been dishonest are sometimes referred to as "Brady cops". Because of the Brady ruling, prosecutors are required to notify defendants and their attorneys whenever a law enforcement official involved in their case has a confirmed record of knowingly lying in an official capacity. This requirement has been understood by lawyers and jurists as requiring prosecutors to maintain lists, known as Brady lists, of police officers who are not credible witnesses and whose involvement in a case undermines a prosecution's integrity.

We don't just make lists of doctors that intentionally harm their patients, arsonist firefighters, chefs that poison etc. -- they are barred from the profession once discovered. But cops (and priests) get to keep doing their thing and at most just get moved around.

[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 20 points 11 months ago

That list should be public because it is within the public interest to know who these dangerous cops are.

[-] Hobbes@startrek.website 10 points 11 months ago

Is there any law stopping private citizens from maintaining such a list I wonder?

[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

It would make you a target for law enforcement because you know, you shouldn't stand out when it comes to them.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago

Of course, there’s no requirement to notify the people previously convicted using testimony from the crooked cop.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Not only are they barred from their profession, they usually go to prison.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Never believe a police statement. It is lies 100% of the time.

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

The officer was not named but an arrest affidavit obtained by ABC News identifies her as Dana Elmore.

What a shit stain.

[-] Johnvanjim@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

My man’s about to get paid granted it’s gonna be taxpayer money, but Jesus…

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
179 points (98.4% liked)

News

23259 readers
3388 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS