364
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by tree@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council resolution Friday calling for a ceasefire to the fighting in Gaza.

The U.S. and Israel have opposed calls for a ceasefire, saying it would strengthen Hamas.

The vote was delayed for several hours over worries the U.S. would veto it. Diplomats from several Arab nations met with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to try to convince the U.S. to abstain from voting.

As a permanent member of the council, the U.S. has veto power, and had signaled it planned to block the resolution. The U.K. abstained from the vote, while the 13 other members of the council voted for it.

read more: https://www.semafor.com/article/12/08/2023/un-security-council-votes-on-gaza-ceasefire-resolution-amid-israel-hamas-conflict

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 122 points 11 months ago

15 countries voting, they lost 13-1 (UK abstained), literally only the US voted against the resolution and yet they can veto it.

[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

It is clearly US and UK vs Gaza children.

"Oh hamas did this and that so lets kill them all, stop water food and aid and move 2 million around" is not justified ...

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

This was always the plan.

People are wising up but I doubt anything can stop it now.

Cat is out of the bag.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Does a "no" vote by the US automatically veto it? Or did they have to take an additional action? If the vote alone didn't veto it, that's the perfect place to hedge your bets. Vote no, then don't veto it. You can claim both sides then to appease everyone.

[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 48 points 11 months ago
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Well that's dumb. But rules are rules.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

aww shucks we have to allow genocide its the rules

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

It was more meant that they couldn't vote no then not veto. That being the case they should have at least abstained like the UK.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 96 points 11 months ago

US refuses to block Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 27 points 11 months ago

US actively supports Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

[-] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 58 points 11 months ago

I don't expect Joe Biden to act against his interests, but I also can't believe he thinks this is in his interest! Are there that many people in America who think this is the right thing to do? People danced when Henry Kissinger died, who fails to see the legacy of this?

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Izzgo@kbin.social 51 points 11 months ago

These are times when I'm ashamed to be an American.

[-] Urist@lemmy.ml 62 points 11 months ago
[-] Izzgo@kbin.social 25 points 11 months ago

I'm 70 years old. Of course it's not the first time. Cute meme though.

[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Nowadays I wonder if you guys have any times you aren't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 38 points 11 months ago

Genocide Joe is insatiable.

load more comments (34 replies)
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

Trump years aside, I've rarely been so ashamed of my country. And I'm no spring chicken.

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago
[-] rando895@lemmy.ml 29 points 11 months ago

No one should have veto power, it makes any organization extremely undemocratic. And given the American arsenal, it's already difficult to be democratic.

[-] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 11 months ago

very good harm reduction from the genocide joe junta

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 26 points 11 months ago

Every civilian death in Gaza going forward is a direct consequence of US actions. US is directly responsible for facilitating a genocide.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yolo@r.nf 25 points 11 months ago

UN is the change.org of the real world. The idea is great but it only works on extremely rare cases. I know its purpose is to stop next world war but it should stop trying to seem like a platform for discussion as there is no discussion to be had when you give someone power to veto any resolution.

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago

The UN with their permanent members are a disgrace. All they do is uphold imperialism and say please don't do that.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
364 points (97.4% liked)

World News

32297 readers
785 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS