this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
366 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

15488 readers
3165 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rasensprenger@feddit.de 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isn’t it only one backslash?

[–] rasensprenger@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

I originally only had one, but apparently my lemmy client parses markdown wrong

[–] Turun@feddit.de 24 points 2 years ago

Shout-out to the PDF reader evince, which shows a preview of the linked part when hovering the link!

Especially useful for hyperlinked images and tables.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] lukini@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What's it like to hold the hand of someone you love? Interlinked.

Do they feel there's a part of you that is missing? Interlinked.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

cries in having to print the whole thing out

[–] LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

cries having chosen to hyperlink sources and citations for a personal project

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do yourself a massive and archive them: https://wallabag.org/

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Hyperlinks in a numbered list is the new APA.

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is a much more interesting format for user stories

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

How often have you followed a reference?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 15 points 2 years ago

I see you've never researched backwater shit holes where you're desperate for any information lol

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Every time? Do you not?

[–] firecat@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Even if they have references, the website might no longer exist or they reference into another document that tells it in a book which you need to know the title to find such book and read the book but that one told you the reference is from a foreign forktale and books of that very cliche story aren’t included on popular literature. That’s when you ask lots of people who have knowledge of said topic to help continue your research. After like hundreds of books you discover a scroll detailing the history of the reference in ok kinda way but leave everything up to you. Afterwards when you got all the information in s neatly styled modern day understanding for Wikiapedia, it gets rejected and you just decide to sent it to someone or keep it until wikipedia stops being a jerk about their rules for newer versions.

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Isn't hyperlinked reference the default? I dont even know how to turn it off.

[–] RoabeArt@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Even worse is when the source is hidden behind a paywall.