157
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What a coward! Nobody who's not part of the cult has any doubt about the fact that he's a traitor and if the "justice" system wasn't thoroughly broken, he'd be in a cell already.

The SoS just doesn't have the guts to do what's right and then deal with the consequences.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

just wait another cycle and red states will be removing a democrat for some complete bullshit reason

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

True, but that doesn't mean that blue states shouldn't do it now for completely legit reasons.

If you don't do anything you fear the fascists might twist for their own nefarious ends, you can't ever do anything.

[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago

Hell, you can't even invent something stylish without it being co-opted by fascists. Hitler ruined the toothbrush mustache.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 7 points 9 months ago

They already tried to cheat the last election then overturn it with violence, it's too late for protecting the rights feels to keep them from acting in bad faith.

[-] autotldr 12 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Dr. Shirley Weber's office did not immediately issue a comment on her decision to include Trump after releasing the list of certified candidates on Thursday night.

She did not indicate if she would fulfill Kounalakis's request and said her decision would be guided by her office's "commitment to and respect for the rule of law."

"Removing a candidate from the ballot under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment is not something my office takes lightly and is not as simple as the requirement that a person be at least 35 years old to be president," Weber wrote.

The calls to strike the former president from the state's ballot came after Colorado's Supreme Court did the same thing, saying he violated the "insurrection clause," a Civil War-era provision of the U.S. Constitution.

"The U.S. Constitution does not tolerate an assault on the foundations of our government, and Section 336 requires me to act in response," Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, wrote in her decision.

"Given the compressed timeframe, the novel constitutional questions involved, the importance of this case, and impending ballot preparation deadlines, I will suspend the effect of my decision until the Superior Court rules on any appeal, or the time to appeal …has expired," Bellows added.


The original article contains 282 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 27%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] skydivekingair@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Decent job by the bot but what’s missing is Bellows is Maine’s SoS who decided to remove Trump from that state’s primary ballot, pending a decision by the Maine Superior Court.

[-] Dragonmind@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

It's truly disappointing when the good guys want to "fight fair" against quite literally the 1 situation where the founders put a backup plan in case of massive corruption of the system.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
157 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3832 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS