859
submitted 10 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] F_Haxhausen@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If he doesn’t believe in giving low income families a meager 40$ a month “welfare” then he should reject the saving Grace that is given from Jesus.

The point of the Gospels of Jesus is that the we are saved ONLY because of the Grace of God, and NOT because of our good works. PERIOD.

Nothing we do gets us the Grace of God. We can’t DO anything to deserve it. It is just given.

Edit: add “Like welfare!” To the end. I forgot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yuriy@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Random fellow in Nebraska here, it’s a depressing place to live if you’re not a staunch republican!

People say Lincoln and Omaha are pretty okay, but I suspect that’s just in comparison to the rest of the state.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

former resident here. you're absolutely correct, and also compared to most of the neighboring states.

[-] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Feeding children is an investment in the future. It's in our economic best interest that new humans are educated, be in good health during adolescence, and are allowed to explore "The New".

[-] BrisvegasLukass@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

What a complete fuckhead. Love Australia.

[-] pozbo@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Something tells me this guy is about to learn about all the poor Iowa residents who don't believe in letting piece of shit politicians continue to breathe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 10 months ago

Breaking: "my home state continues to fall into the neo-conservative hell portal"

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Well, at least Pillen is more honest than Iowa, who tried to make excuses on why. Pillen just openly states that he hates poor people because he's a POS.

Man, I hate living here.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

what an absolute pussy

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 7 points 10 months ago

"I know the governor a little bit, and he seems to be a reasonable man. He's a man who is compassionate in conversation," Love said. "This is out of character..."

Not for a psychopath, it ain't.

[-] autotldr 4 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Nebraska’s Republican governor on Friday reiterated his rejection of $18 million in federal funding to help feed children who might otherwise go hungry while school is out.

That statement came as advocates for children and low-income families held a news conference outside the Governor’s Mansion in Lincoln to call on Pillen to change his mind before the Jan. 1 deadline to sign up for the program.

The program — part of federal assistance made available during the COVID-19 pandemic — would provide pre-loaded EBT cards to families whose children are eligible for free and reduced-price lunches at school.

Many of those who signed the petition also included comments expressing how much the program is needed, especially in light of multi-year inflation that has outpaced many household incomes.

Pillen insisted Friday that the state would continue to help food-insecure children through the Summer Food Service Program, which provides meals and snacks at various sites when school is not in session.

Preston Love Jr,, a longtime community advocate in Omaha, on Friday questioned whether Pillen was bowing to political pressure in rejecting the federal funding.


The original article contains 669 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
859 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4526 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS