55
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] los_chill@programming.dev 37 points 10 months ago

If a word can selectively trigger only the shittiest subset of a population, I'd say that is a pretty effective word. 'Woke' is an amazing word simply because the more someone hates the word, the more I know about them.

[-] ShunkW@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Yep. Met a guy last night who said that woke is a mind virus. Told me all I needed to know and I stopped talking to him.

[-] los_chill@programming.dev 9 points 10 months ago

The craziest thing is that the basic idea of wokeness as I understand it is being aware of the nuances, feelings, and challenges of others, which is also the basic idea of sayings like 'love thy neighbor as thyself' or 'walk a mile in their moccasins before you judge'. Trying my best to help people who are triggered by the idea of 'wokeness' understand that. But more often it seems like they just want a shorthand for demonizing progressives and for them 'woke' is just that: a way of negatively branding any policy that might show compassion.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

The word "woke" is only the latest iteration of reactionary rhetoric critical of liberals. Before it was 'woke' it was 'politically correct' and before that 'bleeding heart'. Conservatives love to recycle, at least when it comes to ideas.

The jab is basically this: Liberals don't really care about the marginalized. They just pretend to in order to feel better about themselves; signal their superiority; and bring those groups into their political sphere (then do nothing to help them). And the reason this criticism has stuck around so long is because it's apt. When conservatives and liberals argue over these issues, too often, the marginalized are not on one of the teams; they're the ball.

The liberal sees the condition of the marginalized; they feel guilty. And that guilt is the thing they really want to remedy. A progressive looking at the same situation feels anger.

[-] kbal@fedia.io -5 points 10 months ago

I suppose they probably did have equally trashy opinion pieces about the word hip in maybe 1972.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
55 points (89.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3390 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS